[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-03-01 Thread Felix Bellaby
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 19:04 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote: On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:07:15AM +, Felix Bellaby wrote: The argument against placing input transformation within the compositor is founded on the assumption that it introduces an unnecessary round trip into the process:

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-28 Thread Felix Bellaby
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:26 -0500, David Reveman wrote: It seems to me like we need to experiment a bit before we can decide what's the best solution. My current patches are at least something to start with and I look forward to discussing it more next week at xdevconf. The compositor

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-06 Thread Colin Guthrie
Xavier Bestel wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:06 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:04 -0500, David Reveman wrote: Non-contiguous windows are important so I wouldn't want an implementation that didn't support that. It didn't add any complexity to support it in my

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-06 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On 2/6/07, Deron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Reveman wrote: From the talks keithp has given on the subject I've understood that implementing this properly is very hard, if not impossible. Is that not the case anymore? In December I came up with an idea which I discussed with Keith

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-06 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:06 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:04 -0500, David Reveman wrote: From the talks keithp has given on the subject I've understood that implementing this properly is very hard, if not impossible. Is that not the case anymore? The hard part

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-06 Thread David Reveman
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:36 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: David Reveman wrote: I'm having trouble understanding this terminology. In this approach I allow every window to have it's own root window coordinate space. In the X server, root window coordinate space means something very

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 12:13 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:26 -0500, David Reveman wrote: I spent some time this week trying to add support for input transformations to the server. I tried a few different approaches. The patches I've attached are what's currently

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:26 -0500, David Reveman wrote: I spent some time this week trying to add support for input transformations to the server. I tried a few different approaches. The patches I've attached are what's currently working best for me. Thanks for getting started on this; I

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:26:13PM -0500, David Reveman wrote: I spent some time this week trying to add support for input transformations to the server. I tried a few different approaches. The patches I've attached are what's currently working best for me. Hi David, This looks largely fine to

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:11 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: It's hard for me to evaluate this without some higher level context. What sort of window transformations are you aiming to support 3D perspective affine transformations? What sort of 3D objects will the windows be mapped onto? There are a

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:56 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: Le lundi 05 février 2007 à 16:10 -0500, David Reveman a écrit : On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:11 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: It's hard for me to evaluate this without some higher level context. What sort of window transformations are you

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 15:22 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: Xavier Bestel wrote: Le lundi 05 février 2007 à 16:10 -0500, David Reveman a écrit : On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:11 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: It's hard for me to evaluate this without some higher level context. What sort