Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-06 Thread Mike Dransfield
David Reveman wrote: On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 23:30 -0500, Erkin Bahceci wrote: Hi, I had thought that inter-plugin communication was possible through privates without adding anything to compiz.h, but apparently it's not (hence the name privates :) ). I guess this is only possible through X

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-05 Thread Erkin Bahceci
Context of the patches were wrong in my previous post. Use these instead. (Again, they should be applied after Mike's last patches). - Erkin On 10/4/06, Erkin Bahceci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I had thought that inter-plugin communication was possible through privates without adding

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-04 Thread Mike Dransfield
Attached is the newer version Erkin Bahceci wrote: Hi, I strongly suggest taking animation.c in Beryl svn rev. 465 or later instead of the version you attached, since the code has undergone lots of improvements (including better performance and new features), fixing, and cleaning up this

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-04 Thread Erkin Bahceci
Hi David, First of all, thanks for your great work with Compiz/Xgl :) I will put disablePostprocessFX in privates. For texCoordSize, we have the Blurfx plugin which needs it. And you might have other plugins in compiz in the future, which use the vertices and indices produced by another plugin

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-04 Thread Solerman Kaplon
Fabio Berta escreveu: Seriously, you got all me wrong! I didn't mean to attack beryl at all! Maybe my words weren't chosen that good! I just wanted to express that I don't like the configuration frontend. That is what I meant with bloated. Not the code, the interface! That's why the gconf

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-04 Thread David Reveman
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:50 -0500, Erkin Bahceci wrote: Hi David, First of all, thanks for your great work with Compiz/Xgl :) I will put disablePostprocessFX in privates. For texCoordSize, we have the Blurfx plugin which needs it. And you might have other plugins in compiz in the

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-04 Thread Erkin Bahceci
On 10/4/06, David Reveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand that it's a replacement and sure, if it proves to be stable and well maintained I'll gladly deprecate the minimize plugin. However, minimize effects are likely going to be implemented in other plugins and it seems that especially

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-04 Thread Erkin Bahceci
Hi, I had thought that inter-plugin communication was possible through privates without adding anything to compiz.h, but apparently it's not (hence the name privates :) ). I guess this is only possible through X window properties, right? Is there a way to do this type of communication in a

[compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-03 Thread Fabio Berta
Hi I just tried out the new 0.1.0 release of beryl. Generally I do like the compiz fdo version, because I like the gconf integration and the metacity theme support in gwd. Also I think their configuration system is a complete mess, this beryl settings manager is completly bloated in my opinion.

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-03 Thread moppsy
On Wed 4.Oct'06 at 2:35:24 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote: Attached is the animation plugin slightly adjusted for compiz rather than beryl There are 2 naughty patches for compiz.h and window.c which will need to be applied before it will compile. These should be dome with privates