On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Frederik Holljen wrote:
> On 25/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> >
> > On 04/24/2009 11:17 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
> >
> > > I propose:
> > > ezcPersistentSessionBase or Definition for the interface
> > > ezcPersistentSessionIdentityDecorator for the decorator
> >
> > > So
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> On 04/22/2009 11:28 PM Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>
> > I see no disadvantages from forcing the current session from
> > overtaking the identity map changes. Its a natural feature addition
> > that shouldn't cause any backwards compability issues.
>
> I
On 25/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> On 04/24/2009 11:17 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
> > On 24/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
>
> >> On 04/24/2009 09:10 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
>
>
> >> Yes. Let me elaborate a bit more: The problem with the decorator
> >> (ezcPersistentIden
Personally i think Base <-> Abstract is almost the same from the meaning,
which makes naming an interface Base somewhat misleading. In light of all the
arguments Tobys initial proposed name is probably the best.
greets,
Benjamin
On Friday 24 April 2009 23:17:13 Frederik Holljen wrote:
> On 24/0
Hi all,
On 04/24/2009 11:17 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
> On 24/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
>> On 04/24/2009 09:10 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
>> Yes. Let me elaborate a bit more: The problem with the decorator
>> (ezcPersistentIdentitySession) is, that it is not "instanceof
>> compatible" w
On 24/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
>
> On 04/24/2009 09:10 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
> > 2009/4/24 Tobias Schlitt :
>
> >> On 04/22/2009 10:08 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
>
> >>> Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know
> >>> (without looking in the do
Hi Fred,
On 04/24/2009 09:10 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
> 2009/4/24 Tobias Schlitt :
>> On 04/22/2009 10:08 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
>>> Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know
>>> (without looking in the docs) what the purpose is for each of them?
>>> What exactly (
2009/4/24 Tobias Schlitt :
> Hi Fred,
>
> On 04/22/2009 10:08 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
>> Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know
>> (without looking in the docs) what the purpose is for each of them?
>
>> What exactly (short in your words) does the new one do?
>
> ezc
Hi Benjamin,
On 04/22/2009 11:28 PM Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> I see no disadvantages from forcing the current session from overtaking the
> identity map changes. Its a natural feature addition that shouldn't cause any
> backwards compability issues.
I disagree. Identity management is a feature
Hi Fred,
On 04/22/2009 10:08 PM Frederik Holljen wrote:
> Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know
> (without looking in the docs) what the purpose is for each of them?
> What exactly (short in your words) does the new one do?
ezcPersistentSession
Basic, origin
On 22/04/2009, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> Still if that is not an option i would go with your suggestions, otherwise
> ezcPersistentSessionInterface is also a good one.
I'd go with that...
--
Components mailing list
Components@lists.ez.no
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
I see no disadvantages from forcing the current session from overtaking the
identity map changes. Its a natural feature addition that shouldn't cause any
backwards compability issues.
Either someone had problems with too many objects of the same type and wrapped
an identity session around a cur
Hmm... isn't that a bit obfuscated? How are people supposed to know
(without looking in the docs) what the purpose is for each of them?
What exactly (short in your words) does the new one do?
Frederik
On 22/04/2009, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> so far, the interface of ezcPersistentSess
Hi all,
so far, the interface of ezcPersistentSession is only fixed by our BC
standards. Now that ezcPersistentIdentitySession is introduced, we'll
need to have an interface that both of these will implement, to be able
to store them in ezcPersistentSessionInstance. Since
ezcPersistentSession (the
14 matches
Mail list logo
