Re: [computer-go] CGOS games

2007-04-25 Thread Don Dailey
No, you are not stupid. I have not yet written the CGI scripts to allow downloads. So there is no easy way (yet) to get them. I'll try to get to this soon. - Don On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 17:23 +0200, Christian Nilsson wrote: > I've been trying to download the complete set of games from the

Re: [computer-go] analysis of UCT and other bandit algorithms for tree search

2007-04-25 Thread Jason House
On 4/25/07, Remi Munos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I did sit down and read the paper for real, I saw that both of those > things were just building up the support for the BAST algorithm. (a) is to > justify accepting a higher regret (in exchange for better worst case > performance). well

Re: [computer-go] analysis of UCT and other bandit algorithms for tree search

2007-04-25 Thread Remi Munos
Le Mercredi 25 Avril 2007 15:49, vous avez écrit : > On 4/25/07, Remi Munos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 3. The goal is to find the optimal leaf rather than the optimal > > > subtree. > > > > I'm not sure to understand this comment. Actually the goal is to find a > > close-to optimal play at th

[computer-go] CGOS games

2007-04-25 Thread Christian Nilsson
I've been trying to download the complete set of games from the new CGOS, but can't seem to find a suitable URL for the job. I tried all kinds of modifications of the URLs from the old system, but none worked. Are the games still available for batch downloads, or do I really have to fetch them one

Re: [computer-go] analysis of UCT and other bandit algorithms for tree search

2007-04-25 Thread Jason House
On 4/25/07, Remi Munos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3. The goal is to find the optimal leaf rather than the optimal subtree. I'm not sure to understand this comment. Actually the goal is to find a close-to optimal play at the root level. Thus finding a close-to-optimal min-max leaf achieves tha

Re: [computer-go] analysis of UCT and other bandit algorithms for tree search

2007-04-25 Thread Remi Munos
Hi > I haven't gotten to read through your paper as carefully as I'd like yet, > but I do have a few observations that may be of benefit to other readers on > the list... Mostly observation of assumptions used in the paper. > > 1. A max tree is used instead of minimax Yes. For min-max trees, seve