The cumulative result is only given using the prior knowledge on top
of RAVE, but it could have been done the other way round and give the
same type of results. Each particular improvement is somehow
independent of the others.
I think I don't understand that.
What do you mean for the other way
Maybe another way to put it:
In Fischer time, the time allowed to play the game is simply a
function of the number of moves in the game. If white moves last,
this time is same for both players, otherwise black gets slightly
more. At the beginning of the game, the time on the clock is the
Using prior knowledge on normal uct, and this was the use of prior
knowledge brought about the same improvement.
You mean, there is more improvement when using both?
It was gnugo default level, and we thought default was 8, but default is
actually 10. I don't see why it is so surprising, I guess
2007/6/23, Yamato [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Using prior knowledge on normal uct, and this was the use of prior
knowledge brought about the same improvement.
You mean, there is more improvement when using both?
I mean that there is no need to have AMAF to get improvement by using prior
knowledge.
Using prior knowledge on normal uct, and this was the use of prior
knowledge brought about the same improvement.
You mean, there is more improvement when using both?
I mean that there is no need to have AMAF to get improvement by using prior
knowledge.
Sorry, what is AMAF?
And I have
Sorry, what is AMAF?
Sorry: All Moves As First :)
OK, I see.
Q_RLGO is not used in MoGo's versions which play online.
Q_MoGo(s,a) is:
- if (self atari(s,a)): 0
- if one pattern, among the patterns used in MoGo's simulation policy,
matches for move a in position s, then 1
- else 0.5
Thanks for
