Hi,
Yes you can:
--nbTotalSimulations 3000
Once you set this option it ignores all other time settings.
Cheers,
Sylvain
2007/10/7, Yamato [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sylvain,
Can I set the number of the simulations per move instead of the
thinking time? (like --simulations 3000)
If possible, it
Yes you can:
--nbTotalSimulations 3000
Once you set this option it ignores all other time settings.
Thanks! It works perfectly.
--
Yamato
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
Hi Olivier,
Thanks a lot. (^^)/
# A Japanese face mark. Smiling with left hand up. No need to rotate
your head, like this :-).
-gg
Olivier Teytaud: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are many variants of MoGo run on CGOS 9x9
now # http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/standings.html
Hello all;
I remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is no restriction on how many mogo bots can run. However, there
is not much of a point if everyone is just running the same bot unless
they are running at different levels and we can see exactly how they are
set up.
- - Don
Hideki Kato
Found this link and thought you all might find it interesting.
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct07/5552
Interesting part for me so far:
At my lab at Microsoft Research Asia, in Beijing, I am organizing a
graduate student project to design the hardware and software elements
that will test the
Quite interesting, but after all, it completely neglects the difficulties to
a) determine the life status of groups
b) build an evaluation function out of this
Benjamin
Joshua Shriver schrieb:
Found this link and thought you all might find it interesting.
I thought it was an interesting article, full of gems and annoyances.
I couldn't help to get the feeling the author was poking fun at
Kasparov at times.
Despite that, I am curious to see what kind of hardware he and his
students produce. Guess if there is going to be a Deep Go he'd be the
one to
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 17:33 -0400, Joshua Shriver wrote:
Found this link and thought you all might find it interesting.
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct07/5552
Umm, this article was linked to and discussed heavily here within the
past week:
Oops sorry didnt realise.
On 10/7/07, Jeff Nowakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 17:33 -0400, Joshua Shriver wrote:
Found this link and thought you all might find it interesting.
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct07/5552
Umm, this article was linked to and discussed
