Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
59.43 X longer.
So if we plot 9X9 rank vs time, maybe we have a straight line :)
ELO vs size of the tree
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
59.43 X longer.
So if we plot 9X9 rank vs time,
I'm going to do a private autotest with just the first 6 levels or so -
to see if I get the same bend. I will leave out gnugo for the time
being to see what happens.If I don't get a bend, I will try adding
gnugo in a fresh test.
- Don
Harald Korneliussen wrote:
Don Dailey wrote:
Don Dailey wrote:
It's also interesting how the graph up to level 11 seems to form 2 very
straight lines, almost as if they were connected at an angle.
This must be a by-product of how we started the test. We played only
the first 4 levels as we were testing the system and that is where the
Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
Alain Baeckeroot wrote:
Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and
