on 19x19 board, any thought on getting computer to win all the games with
handicap 9(may be started at 13), then improve to handicap 8,7...?
Olivier Teytaud wrote:
>> Has the program become that much stronger on 9x9 recently?
>> (Compared to the version was trying?)
>
> *Parallelization: MPI ==> ~80% vs no mpi in 9x9 (for same number of
> cores).
>
> *Monte-Carlo improvement ==> strongly depends on number of simulations
> and number of cores (as the multi-core reduces the influence of the
> computational overhead), ~55% I guess.
>
> *Openings: 58%, for games with constant time per move (should be higher
> for games with given total time), if we only keep the openings which
> are still efficient in the new version of the code. Human-based
> openings do not work :-(
>
> *less interestingly, we have a better hardware than at that time (more
> cores, more GHz).
>
> ==> no doubt that this mogo is by far stronger than the one at
> Amsterdam 07.
>
> The improvement is much higher in 19x19, but humans are really too
> strong in 19x19 :-)
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now._______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
