Please download newest version, I made some ifdefWIN 32 ... to aid
mingw porting.
http://github.com/lukaszlew/libego/zipball/master
Under linux I can cross compile to windows binary with a following command
$ i586-mingw32msvc-g++ -o engine.exe ego/ego.cpp example/main.cpp -O3
-march=native -Iego
Success! I was able to build on WinXP using Scons and minGW (with gcc4.3.3).
Here's what (finally) worked for me:
1. Install Python 2.6.2
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.6.2/python-2.6.2.msi
2. Install minGW (using TDM's installer on empty minGW directory)
I do have a core2, but it complained about that switch:
ego/ego.cpp:1: error: bad value (core2) for -march= switch
ego/ego.cpp:1: error: bad value (core2) for -mtune= switch
example/main.cpp:1: error: bad value (core2) for -march= switch
example/main.cpp:1: error: bad value (core2) for -mtune=
After I used a better MinGW build, with a newer gcc (the one Ben suggested), I
get must better results with no compiler warnings:
40.0609 kpps/GHz
Lukasz, the march options of native, i686 and core2 all worked and came out to
similar results with i686 being slightly faster for me.
Łukasz
That seems like a good speed.
On my Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5450 @ 1.66GHz, using linux and
the exact compiler libego was tuned for, I get 42 kpps/GHz.
On my AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+, using the same
compiler, I only get 37 kpps/GHz.
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:09
There's a big difference between kpps and kpps/GHz! For your system,
you need to divide by two (and on my core2, divide by 1.66).
For raw kpps, I think I had 70 on my core2 and 100 on the AMD64.
Do you consistently get garbage such as -154.124 for your kpps/GHz?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr
I haven't got a ladder example at the moment, but here's an instance where
Leela does not realize it is in terrible trouble.
I ( with my 8 kyu AGA rating) know with certainty by move 223 (T5) that Black
has captured a large white group. A stronger player could read this out sooner
than I. This
I ( with my 8 kyu AGA rating) know with certainty by move 223 (T5)
that Black has captured a large white group. A stronger player could
read this out sooner than I. This fight is too big to lose for either
side; nothing else on the board matters.
Yes! I use Many Faces and GoGui/Mogo for
I've only looked at the first game, but it does seem very interesting to
analyze. The white group around H2 is near death as well and I think
Leela's evaluation considered that group to be threatened. Once that is
solidly alive, it does switch to the semeai on the right. I probably
would not
Here is my full set of numbers. I wonder why the known kpps/GHz but unknown
kpps.
= Benchmarking, please wait ...
= 20 playouts in 0 seconds
1.#INF kpps
40.0245 kpps/GHz (clock independent)
105316/94359 (black wins / white wins)
= 20 playouts in 0 seconds
1.#INF kpps
40.0721
Because your time measurement has gone wrong. You get 0 seconds in
time hence kpssa in infinity.
Petri
2009/4/23 Michael Williams michaelwilliam...@gmail.com:
Here is my full set of numbers. I wonder why the known kpps/GHz but unknown
kpps.
= Benchmarking, please wait ...
= 20
translated to Ishi-go
B 1 Q4
W 2 R16
B 3 C4
W 4 F3
...
***
modified Ishi-go
1. q4
2. r16
3. c4
4. f3
...
from the west - my modified Ishi-go-format should be even
better. (The repetitive B W are a bit annoying in Ishi-go,
and small letters are better to read than capital
12 matches
Mail list logo
