>On that topic, I have around 17 flag who enable or not features in my
>pure playouts bots, and I want to search the best combinations of them.
>I known this is almost a dream but does anyone know the best way to
>approximate this.
Pebbles randomly chooses (using a zero asymptotic regret strategy)
Just a wild guess here. One way to get catastrophically slow performance is to
have superfluous nested loops. For instance, one could iterate over each board
space, calling a routine to check for legality. If the legality routine also
iterates over the whole board (perhaps by updating all liber
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:19:01AM -0800, Peter Drake wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:03:56PM -0800, Seth Pellegrino wrote:
> >>* I've already got a stable base that I'm working from (specifically,
> >>Peter Drake's Orego[1]).
> >
> > (You
On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:03:56PM -0800, Seth Pellegrino wrote:
* I've already got a stable base that I'm working from (specifically,
Peter Drake's Orego[1]).
(You could also choose a better base to work from,
e.g. libego, Pachi or Fuego, bu
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:31:21AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> For the liberties, of course that applies since they are used very often
> and take little memory (if you are sensible about it), but also always
> get in mind to avoid universal truths - not all features pay off to be
> maintained incr
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:21:25AM +0100, Thomas Lavergne wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:25:53PM -0800, Seth Pellegrino wrote:
> > Apologies all for replying to myself so many times, but Darren Cook
> > has been kind enough to help me clear the matter up. Essentially, I
> > had misread his pap
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:25:53PM -0800, Seth Pellegrino wrote:
> Apologies all for replying to myself so many times, but Darren Cook
> has been kind enough to help me clear the matter up. Essentially, I
> had misread his paper. I was trying to compute the expensive features
> Rémi uses for progre
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:03:56PM -0800, Seth Pellegrino wrote:
> Thank you both for your speedy replies. I do apologize, though, as I
> seem to have left some important information out:
>
> * I know that 70pps is useless, hence my dismay when that's the speed
> I was getting.
> * I am ru
