Alas, the limitations of a hosted environment would make participating in
Baduk.io a non-starter for me. It is much better to build a selection of
standard bots and run tests on my own hardware. Which is what I have done in
the absence of CGOS.
IMO, running using one’s own hardware/OS/langua
Thanks everyone for all the feedback! Sorry I hijacked the thread!
There are definitely some big pros and cons to a hosted, containerized
environment for Go bots. I've replied to some comments below:
Won’t hosting limit your usability? With cgos I can build and immediately
> test on cgos on my d
If you can send me a binary that would be greatly appreciated. Trying
to build some anchors now.
-Josh
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Hideki Kato wrote:
> Shilver,
>
> I'll be able to run FatMan1, the anchor for 9x9, on my site, if
> necessary. Or, it's also possible to send you its binary a
Shilver,
I'll be able to run FatMan1, the anchor for 9x9, on my site, if
necessary. Or, it's also possible to send you its binary and password
so that you can run it on your site.
Hideki
Joshua Shriver:
:
>I'll try and get CGOS back online before this weekend. Technically it
>should be runn
Anyone have a list of stable, freely downloadable Go engines that I
could use as anchors?
Name/download/ELO rating would be appreciated.
Figured worse case I'd use gnugo for an anchor but would like to have
a couple of varying strength.
They can run on Windows or Linux.
-Josh
I'll try and get CGOS back online before this weekend. Technically it
should be running now, but there were several issues. In order to use
it now you take the cgos client for your architecture and you have
to specify cgos.computergo.org manually since the binaries are
hardcoded to the old boa
I think hosted is a bad idea - anyone developing a bot has a computer
and a development environment, and it may not be linux, and the extra
step of updating and installing on the host is just sand in the gears.
And of course, hosting is not free.
___
Co
On Jan 13, 2015, at 4:52 AM, Woody Folsom wrote:
> I would be interested in participating, particularly as a containerized
> environment puts me on a more even footing with projects which have a lot
> more hardware to throw at the problem.
That’s an interesting setting for a tournament but not
I would be interested in participating, particularly as a containerized
environment puts me on a more even footing with projects which have a lot
more hardware to throw at the problem. Plus, I am in the process of
porting my engine from Java to C# and will need to rewrite the interface to
the KGS
I can see both advantages and disadvantages to this system. The advantages
are that I don't need to have a computer to run the system, and that
(presumably) all bots have the same resources at their disposal, so that
would level the playing field. The downsides are of course that the bot
needs to r
10 matches
Mail list logo
