Re: [Computer-go] [ANN] Imago - Go board optical recognition

Marc Landgraf gmail.com> writes: > Out of curiosity...In the picture you linked > ( http://i59.tinypic.com/10cnu5c.jpg ), how does your program read > the position in the top left, considering the illegal stone there?  > > Or does it not have any Go rules knowledge and leaves the interpretation

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

Hi, As far as remember, old CGOS anchor were 9x9 FatMan ... Hideki Kato 13x13 Gnugo-3.7.10-a4 ... Hideki Kato 19x19 Gnugo-3.7.10-a1 ... Hiroshi Yamashita And I tried to run Gnugo-3.7.10-a1 in 13x13 with same password, it looks running as an anchor luckly. I will keep it running for a

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

I had a look into the sourced of cgos server. If I understand them correctly, one must put the anchors directly into the database. The sources do not seem to have a configuration option for this?! As the old database is used, as far as I understood it, person running the anchors years ago cou

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

You are right, I too often read 3.7 in the past, but actually the papers using 3.8 now:) Am 17.01.2015 um 12:08 schrieb Urban Hafner: On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Detlef Schmicker > wrote: Seems a good idea to me. It is a quasi standard in publishing, so wh

Re: [Computer-go] [ANN] Imago - Go board optical recognition

Out of curiosity... In the picture you linked ( http://i59.tinypic.com/10cnu5c.jpg ), how does your program read the position in the top left, considering the illegal stone there? Or does it not have any Go rules knowledge and leaves the interpretation to the user? In that case it may create .sgf w

Re: [Computer-go] [ANN] Imago - Go board optical recognition

Hi mr. Baudis! > we must have missed PhotoKifu when surveying the available software. We're getting used to that. In Italy Go is completely unknown and everything related goes unnoticed. Months ago I showed the program to a colleague of mine, who shares many of my hobbies, and he asked "What is t

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Detlef Schmicker wrote: > Seems a good idea to me. It is a quasi standard in publishing, so why not > set Gnugo-3.7.10 at level 10 to 1800ELO on every board size?! > Why 3.7.10 and not 3.8? IIRC all Gnu projects use the odd numbered point releases as unstable re

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS back online

Seems a good idea to me. It is a quasi standard in publishing, so why not set Gnugo-3.7.10 at level 10 to 1800ELO on every board size?! Am 16.01.2015 um 23:17 schrieb Christoph Birk: On 01/16/2015 12:03 PM, David Doshay wrote: cgos.boardspace.net says: At the curr