Re: [computer-go] Re: Open source real time Go server

2010-01-18 Thread Adriaan van Kessel
most users use a client and never use the commandline or read the help pages. It was started because some (polish?,Chinse?) guys had created translated forks of the code, which we wanted to remerge. HTH, Adriaan van Kessel. Disclaimer RIVM___ computer

Re: [computer-go] Re: Open source real time Go server

2010-01-18 Thread Adriaan van Kessel
computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org wrote on 18-01-2010 09:21:43: Back up a bit - what's your primary interest ? I can readily believe that not many near blind play Go on the internet now, but what makes you believe a properly supportive server would bring them out of the woods, or that

Re: [computer-go] Re: Open source real time Go server

2010-01-18 Thread Adriaan van Kessel
computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org wrote on 18-01-2010 18:16:28: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:43:34PM +0100, Adriaan van Kessel wrote: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org wrote on 18-01-2010 11:34:52: (ii) NNGS might be used as possible base of a modern go server. The obvious advantage

Re: [computer-go] Pseudo liberties: Detect 2 unique liberties?

2009-04-07 Thread Adriaan van Kessel
computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org wrote on 07-04-2009 18:33:34: Thanks. What about linked lists? They seem to be both compact and fast to merge and detect duplicates. Why have you abandoned them? Linked lists have a terrible cache behaviour: every pointer (or index) dereference has a nearly

Re: [computer-go] Transpostions in UCT search

2008-10-27 Thread Adriaan van Kessel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27-10-2008 14:57:54: On 27-okt-08, at 11:51, terry mcintyre wrote: - Original Message From: Mark Boon [EMAIL PROTECTED] snippage Let me first describe what I did (ar attempted to do): all nodes are stored in a hash-table using a checksum.