On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:54:51AM -0500, Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro wrote:
> Hello. I am asking for help finding the following paper:
>
> J. M. Robson (1983) “The Complexity of Go”. Proceedings of the IFIP
> Congress 1983 p. 413-417.
>
> I could not find it online. There is no DOI anywhere
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:28:34PM -0700, Anders Kierulf wrote:
>> It would be good if your document would clearly state which properties
>> are part of the FF[4] standard and which ones you’re adding.
>> For example, JD (Japanese Date) is not in FF[4], yet is listed as
>> “standardized in this
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 11:42:30AM -0800, David Fotland wrote:
> I think the character set property just refers to the contents
> of comments and similar fields. The sgf format itself is entirely
> in the common characters in UTF-8 and US-ASCII.
> There is no need to assume a character set before
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:28:34PM -0700, Anders Kierulf wrote:
> It would be good if your document would clearly state which properties
> are part of the FF[4] standard and which ones you’re adding.
> For example, JD (Japanese Date) is not in FF[4], yet is listed as
> “standardized in this
The SGF format is wildly successful. It is virtually the unique format
in the West, and one of the major formats in the East.
However, there is no precise definition of the format.
In particular, FF[4] is not precise and where it is precise
it is too strict to follow.
One troublesome area is that
Erik van der Werf write on 2014-12-15:
Also, if you're not careful, it is quite easy to get
duplicate games in your dataset (I've had cases where
one game was annotated in chinese, and the other (duplicate) in
English, or where the board was simply rotated). My solution
around this was to
