That was my first thought too
- actually my 2nd, my 1st was (8*8/2)/(2^64) -
but I reason, one particular choice of position A's 8 must match one particular
choice of
position B's,
rather than any one of A's matching the particular one of B's.
But since the choosing is biased, the chance of
I think that would be worse. There are lots of sets of 8 numbers that sum the
same,
far more than there are sets of 8 with the same minimum element.
Arthur
- Original Message -
From: Álvaro Begué [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, December 20, 2007 4:08 pm
Subject: Re: [computer-go]
I stand corrected.
Arthur
- Original Message -
From: Álvaro Begué [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, December 20, 2007 4:37 pm
Subject: Re: [computer-go] rotate board
To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
On Dec 20, 2007 11:23 AM, Arthur W Cater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
It's really a way to incrementally update liberties in a
fast way - each stone keeps it's own count of liberties
and it is summed - but of course it doesn't represent
the true number of liberties since a point can get
counted 2 or more times.However, if the count goes
to zero, the
