On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Willemien wilem...@googlemail.com wrote:
I disagree with the point that MCTS is a neural network,
In my opinion (and i maybe completely off target) One of the essences
of neural networks is that the program changes/learns from the games
it has played. .
I
2009/4/14 Brian Sheppard sheppar...@aol.com:
But in game 739216 the stones are the same, but the other color is moving.
That can't be a repetition...
Well, that's what distinguishes _positional_ superko from _situational_
superko. See http://senseis.xmp.net/?Superko .
As Jason House wrote,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Robert Jasiek jas...@snafu.de wrote:
Richard Brown wrote:
Positional superko, IMHO, has no such elegant rationale.
It is a ko rule that depends on only what one can see on the board.
Elegant.
And what is the _reason_ to leave out the information of whose
The enemy's key point is my own is often invoked, for example, as a
reason to occupy the central point of a _nakade_ shape, or to play a
double sente point, or to make an extension that would also be an
extension for the opponent.
I would like now to talk about it in the context of the potential
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Jason House
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 19, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Rémi Coulom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ICGA...]
So I am your representative, and any question or suggestion is welcome.
I don't know what that
On Nov 30, 2007 9:00 AM, Ben Lambrechts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You find it in http://daogo.org/download/computer_go_02.pdf page 27
I was a subscriber to this journal. When I read this piece back in
1987, I had assumed that it was humor; a joke.
The article provides a number of subtle clues
On 7/26/07, chrilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a remarkable result. I think poker is more difficult than Go and of
course chess. My hypothesis (its just a hypothesis) for the success is.
There is someone - Dave Billings - who worked for many years very
consequently on the topic. And he is
On 7/20/07, Joshua Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone recommend a good book on programming Neural Networks in C or C++?
Been digging around the net for while and haven't come up with
anything other than an encyclopedia-like definition/writeup. No
examples or tutorials.
There are some C
On 7/12/07, Chris Fant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, gomputers are real:
http://www.google.com/search?q=gomputer
Maybe you were joking, but did you notice that one of the hits
from that search was a URL where the spelling was not only
used _intentionally_, but also -- in a remarkable
On 7/11/07, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dirty hack I'm referring to is the robotic way this is implemented
in programs, not how it's done in humans. With a pattern based program
you essentially specify everything and the program is not a participant
in the process. It comes down
On 7/10/07, Chris Fant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonetheless, a program that could not only play a decent game of go, but
somehow emulate the _style_ of a given professional would be of interest,
would it not?
Is this the case in chess? If so, I've never heard of it.
I don't think that it
Nick Wedd wrote:
I prefer unprune to graft.
Graft implies adding something to a tree which does not naturally
belong there.
Not naturally?
Consider a tree, to which you, the tree surgeon, have taken a pair of shears,
and lopped off a branch. What has been pruned, has been pruned.
Q. By
Sylvain Gelly wrote:
Thank you all for your precise answers!
Sylvain
p.s. the find out more link at the bottom of your page
http://www.inria.fr/futurs/ressources-1/computer-culture/mogo-champion-program-for-go-games
is pointing to the wrong place, isn't it?
What do you mean?
Sylvain Gelly wrote:
my favorite line:
In Go all marbles are identical...
My English prevent me to understand the subtlety here.
Is there any relation to the type of stone meaning of marble?
No, not really.
Here the meaning of marbles is that of children's toys, small
spherical
Chris Fant wrote:
Here is a completed game of Go between two random players... on a very
large board.
For ascetics, the eyes have been filled after both players passed.
I think you mean aesthetics. Ascetics are guys who torture themselves,
and deny themselves pleasure, in a struggle to
Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
Unfortunately, having more than one dimensions makes comparisons
impossible - if an ordering relation is defined over the domain, then
this domain is one-dimensional with regard to that relation.
In other words, one can't compare vectors, just scalars. So the
16 matches
Mail list logo
