I think CrazyPattern does not do any simulation at all. It just predict the
move according pattern lib and Generalized Bradley-Terry model.
Remi: it would be nice, if one could change the amount of simulations,
altough I guess it has to be rather small so that those several hundred
of games
I believe the original paper used 32 simulations from each point as part
of its pattern... But the spirit of it (as I understand it) really is
to bias the 1-ply move selection at the start of MC searches. (In Crazy
Stone, just 3x3 patterns are used at deeper ply?)
elife wrote:
I think
Jason House wrote:
I believe the original paper used 32 simulations from each point as
part of its pattern... But the spirit of it (as I understand it)
really is to bias the 1-ply move selection at the start of MC
searches. (In Crazy Stone, just 3x3 patterns are used at deeper ply?)
elife
Erik van der Werf wrote:
It might be interesting to see how Rémi Coulom's move predictor does
on these positions.
Erik
You can now donwload it as a GTP engine from the page of the paper:
http://remi.coulom.free.fr/Amsterdam2007/
Rémi
___
On 8/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I organized side event Predict Professinal Moves at
European Go Congress 2007. I made a brief and shallow
summary (without any analysis) of the results and decided
to post it here---in case someone is actually interested ;).
The side
Erik van der Werf wrote:
On 8/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I organized side event Predict Professinal Moves at
European Go Congress 2007. I made a brief and shallow
summary (without any analysis) of the results and decided
to post it here---in case someone is actually
uh, never mind. i should have looked a little more
closely at the situation. :)
s.
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 8:34:26 AM
Subject: [computer-go] EGC2007
I organized side event
I organized side event Predict Professinal Moves at
European Go Congress 2007. I made a brief and shallow
summary (without any analysis) of the results and decided
to post it here---in case someone is actually interested ;).
The side event:
http://users.tkk.fi/eseurane/EGC2007/experiment.pdf
