> Interesting! Can those involved with other strong programs verify this?
Pebbles isn't a particularly strong program, but using real
liberty counts is better.
I have recently taken Pebbles offline to renovate internals.
I am adding lists of liberties, too. I am convinced that the
richer represen
2009/9/1 Peter Drake :
> On Sep 1, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Fotland wrote:
>
> I don’t think any of the strong programs use pseudoliberties.
>
> Interesting! Can those involved with other strong programs verify this?
> My board code is descended from my Java re-implementation of libEGO. I tried
> wr
I never tried pseudoliberties in Valkyria. It actually stores arrays
of the liberties in addition to the count. This make programming
complex algorithms simple, but perhaps not the most efficient way.
-Magnus
Quoting Peter Drake :
On Sep 1, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Fotland wrote:
I don?t
On Sep 1, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Fotland wrote:
I don’t think any of the strong programs use pseudoliberties.
Interesting! Can those involved with other strong programs verify this?
My board code is descended from my Java re-implementation of libEGO. I
tried writing one using real liberti
But note that Fuego is using a GNU license, so if you incorporate any of the
Fuego code into your own app, you will have to make your own app available
under the GNU license and distribute source to your customers.
David
> I strongly recommend reading the Fuego source code. Their ideas and
> impl
-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Peter Drake
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:51 AM
To: computer-go
Subject: Re: [computer-go] MoGo policy: capture stones anywhere?
On Aug 31, 2009, at 10:12 PM, terry mcintyre wrote:
If you maintain a list of "strings" ( connected groups ) of s
IIRC, Fuego has an urgent rule that captures the last-played stone.
That rule applies before any others. Then the mop-up capture rule
applies just before playing randomly.
Mop-up capture is facilitated by a list of strings in atari. Pebbles
keeps such a list, like Many Faces. Having such a list is
On Aug 31, 2009, at 10:12 PM, terry mcintyre wrote:
If you maintain a list of "strings" ( connected groups ) of stones
and their liberty counts - or perhaps the actual liberties - it
should be fairly quick to find a string with just one liberty.
I'm currently using pseudoliberties, so that
Message-
> From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
> boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Peter Drake
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:56 PM
> To: Computer Go
> Subject: [computer-go] MoGo policy: capture stones anywhere?
>
> MoGo's playout policy
31, 2009 9:56:16 PM
Subject: [computer-go] MoGo policy: capture stones anywhere?
MoGo's playout policy (at one time) is given in section 3.2 of Gelly et al's
paper, "Modification of UCT with Patterns in Monte-Carlo Go":
"We describe briefly how the improved random mode ge
MoGo's playout policy (at one time) is given in section 3.2 of Gelly
et al's paper, "Modification of UCT with Patterns in Monte-Carlo Go":
"We describe briefly how the improved random mode generates moves. It
first verifies
whether the last played move is an Atari; if yes, and if the stones
11 matches
Mail list logo
