> > Not so - Microsoft's .NET framework has both networking and GUI support.
> > The Mono provides a Linux implementation. In fact, with Silverlight (and
> > Moonlight, for Mono), the .NET framework can be used within a modern web
> > browser (very similar to Java and Flash combined).
>
> It rema
>
>Not so - Microsoft's .NET framework has both networking and GUI support. The
>Mono provides a Linux implementation. In fact, with Silverlight (and
>Moonlight, for Mono), the .NET framework can be used within a modern web
>browser (very similar to Java and Flash combined).
It remains to be
>
>Not so - Microsoft's .NET framework has both networking and GUI support. The
>Mono provides a Linux implementation. In fact, with Silverlight (and
>Moonlight, for Mono), the .NET framework can be used within a modern web
>browser (very similar to Java and Flash combined).
It remains to be
Too bad this is true.
On the other hand, even Lisp is making progress in the field - SBCL
and maybe wxCL (wxWidgets for CL) might already be an option, though
it might be a bit of pain in the backside..
On Nov 21, 2007 11:42 PM, Dave Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Maybe we should really
- Original Message
From: Dave Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The only methodology where both networking and GUIs are cross platform
> is Java.
Not so - Microsoft's .NET framework has both networking and GUI support. The
Mono provides a Linux implementation. In fact, with Silverlight (and Moo
>
>Maybe we should really think of a project - doesn't have to be the one
>I started (now I find most of it ugly..)
>
>Who'd be in?
GUIs are the bane of all "framework" projects. They're essential and
wildly unstandardized, both across platforms and for different
development environments, even
