On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 20:18 -0800, David Doshay wrote:
I would highly recommend that you do your testing against
a different Go engine. Self-play is a weak indicator.
Cheers,
David
I agree that there is a pretty good amount of in-transitivity
with self-play.
However there is not a
Le samedi 27 janvier 2007 14:07, Don Dailey a écrit :
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 20:18 -0800, David Doshay wrote:
I would highly recommend that you do your testing against
a different Go engine. Self-play is a weak indicator.
Cheers,
David
I agree that there is a pretty good amount of
Le samedi 27 janvier 2007 14:58, alain Baeckeroot a écrit :
Le samedi 27 janvier 2007 14:07, Don Dailey a écrit :
I agree that there is a pretty good amount of in-transitivity
with self-play.
You can use the furiously fast and weak following programs:
gnugo-1.2 (604 ELO on cgos 9X9 ,
Handicap stones.
- Dave Hillis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] early results
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 20:18 -0800, David Doshay wrote:
I would highly recommend
I would highly recommend that you do your testing against
a different Go engine. Self-play is a weak indicator.
Cheers,
David
On 26, Jan 2007, at 5:39 PM, Don Dailey wrote:
Here are some early results on the scalability study.
Basically, level 2 beats level 1 83.6 percent of the time.
