Now I don't feel so bad -- my UCT prog also sucks ass, only slower.
On 4/13/07, Darren Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying the libego program out of the box, and am up to
200,000 UCT playouts, but still gnugo 3.6 on level 6 is winning 10 out
of 10. ...
If 200,000 play-outs is
This is something that I have been wondering about. It seems to me that
since UCT is exploring moves by choosing the move with the most
optimistic score (estimate plus confidence bound) that it would be very
natural to play the move with the highest conservative score (estimate
minus confidence
Libego played at old CGOS with name sth like UCT-107-???k
100k was about 1550k
200k about 1650k
I don't remember and I can't find the rating list anymore.
Łukasz
On 4/14/07, Darren Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying the libego program out of the box, and am up to
200,000 UCT
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 20:13 +0200, Łukasz Lew wrote:
Libego played at old CGOS with name sth like UCT-107-???k
100k was about 1550k
200k about 1650k
I don't remember and I can't find the rating list anymore.
Łukasz
I have posted the cross-tables, so you should be able to
figure out
Maybe try this test with libego?
Don Dailey:
I have one interesting test that I do, which I take
with a grain of salt, but I use as a first guess estimate. I search
from the opening position a few hundred times and average the time
required to find the move e5.My assumption is that e5 is
