RE: [computer-go] Making Java much faster
Both do just in time compilation, but the -server option uses more optimisation tricks. Sometimes these make a significant difference, sometimes not. Without the JIT, it would be *very* much slower. Best regards, Simon Lucas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Drake Sent: 28 November 2006 21:37 To: Computer Go Subject: [computer-go] Making Java much faster Everyone here has offered me all kinds of useful advice on speeding up or otherwise improving Orego. In thanks, I offer a recent (to me) discovery about how to make Java programs run much faster. Instead of java MyProgram do java -server MyProgram It's not entirely clear what the difference between "server mode" and the default "client mode" is -- maybe just-in-time compilation? In any case, I found that it nearly doubled the speed of a small program. Peter Drake Assistant Professor of Computer Science Lewis & Clark College http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/ ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
[computer-go] Making Java much faster
Everyone here has offered me all kinds of useful advice on speeding up or otherwise improving Orego. In thanks, I offer a recent (to me) discovery about how to make Java programs run much faster. Instead of java MyProgram do java -server MyProgram It's not entirely clear what the difference between "server mode" and the default "client mode" is -- maybe just-in-time compilation? In any case, I found that it nearly doubled the speed of a small program. Peter Drake Assistant Professor of Computer Science Lewis & Clark College http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/ ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
[computer-go] Paper presents results on proximity heuristic
Here it is: https://webdisk.lclark.edu/xythoswfs/webui/_xy-2115826_1-t_OX34gnaB Peter Drake Assistant Professor of Computer Science Lewis & Clark College http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/ ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
Re: [computer-go] .. if Monte-Carlo programs would play infinitestrong
>> It is said if has 4 stones handicap, every Pro will accept games play with >> God even if bet his life. > I would not trust this. Usually, masters cannot be objective and fair when > they are referring to their own playing ability. > And just to add to this, I'm sure their tune would change if the bet was > really for their life. Maybe you are right. But, a 19x19 game with 4 stones handicap is not so complicated I think. (usually 4 stones handicap worth about 50 points or more.) Masters do not know how to play a optimal game, and maybe can't read so much and deep, but they know they will win. ☆☆(^^; (recently there are no difference between Pro 1d...9d, so we can say they are almost equal.) igo ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
