CGOS has many strong points: it automatically schedules games, it has a lot of
sample points to drive the ELO ratings, it preserves game records, and it has
many participating programs. It also distinguishes between versions of the
programs - important to consider when the CGL games span severa
It seems far less automatic, so I would think it has disadvantages.
Cheers,
David
On 17, Jan 2007, at 1:45 PM, Chris Fant wrote:
Does the ladder have any advantage over CGOS in any respect?
On 1/17/07, terry mcintyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the Computer Go Ladder still active? I don
Does the ladder have any advantage over CGOS in any respect?
On 1/17/07, terry mcintyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the Computer Go Ladder still active? I don't see any change in standings
since August 2006, and I suspect that Viking and Mogo would do rather well
against many of the current c
Is the Computer Go Ladder still active? I don't see any change in standings
since August 2006, and I suspect that Viking and Mogo would do rather well
against many of the current contestants, based upon their results on the CGOS
server:
http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/go/ladder.html
Terry McIntyre
[
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Jacques Basaldúa wrote:
Any coherent higher dimension model should explain which
of the three circumstances is not met, how and why and
without making any particular dimension different from the
others. Something a lot more complicated than just drawing
"easy conclusions" fro
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Don Dailey wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 16:21 -0800, Christoph Birk wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Don Dailey wrote:
One of the theoretical limitations to
computing power (which was layed out in someones posts) and I have
always understood to be the case, is related to
space
> Have you trawled through http://senseis.xmp.net/?GoBlogs?
I have (briefly). But I haven't found anything. Maybe there aren't any
bloggers out there that are also Computer Go programmers?
Mick Reiss, but he updates very rarely.
http://www.reiss.demon.co.uk/webgo/compgo.htm
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 17, 2007, at 15:43 , Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
More correctly, a planet aggregates RSS feeds (rather than blogs).
To be pedantic, it also aggregates RDF and Atom feeds if you want to
;)
This means that you can add things like the the RSS f
Way off topic, on behalf of physical evidence of the dimension of universe:
In an n-dimensional universe any radiation that propagates under
common circumstances:
1. Conservation of energy
2. Constant speed
3. Isotropy (same intensity in all directions)
satisfies:
At a distance d from the sour
I copied this from another post someone made:
Here is a summary of how it works:
- Use probability of winning as score, not territory
- Use the average outcome as position value
- Select the move that maximizes v + sqrt((2*log(t))/(10*n))
v is the value of the move (average outcome, betw
Hi, Don
Don Dailey wrote:
> v + sqrt((2*log(t))/(10*n)) ..
> .. n the number of simulations of this move
1. Does that mean the number in any branch?
Do you store an array with the number of times
each move is played, no matter in what branch?
2. Do you have some explanation for this expression
More correctly, a planet aggregates RSS feeds (rather than blogs).
This means that you can add things like the the RSS feeds from version
control systems, wikis, mailing lists, etc, etc
Have you trawled through http://senseis.xmp.net/?GoBlogs ?
cheers
stuart
On 1/17/07, Urban Hafner <[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej everybody,
I'd like to announce Planet Computer-Go at
http://computer-go.bettong.net. This is a website that aggregates all
the blog posts about Computer-Go. Unfortunately it's very hard (at
least for me) to find blog about computer go. I mean go
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 06:03 -0300, Eduardo Sabbatella wrote:
> As far I know, just coffee speaking with some physics
> friends. WE ALL live in multi dimensional world.
> Indeed, if more then 3 dimensions exists, we exist in
> them, also our computers. The thing is, our eyes only
> see the first th
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 03:47 -0600, Nick Apperson wrote:
> I bet Windows Vista would still run slow on God's computer though. Go
> Microsoft! Sorry to get off topic, I just figure we have beat this
> subject to death.
You would probably just have to reboot it more often.
> - Nick
>
_
I bet Windows Vista would still run slow on God's computer though. Go
Microsoft! Sorry to get off topic, I just figure we have beat this subject
to death.
- Nick
On 1/17/07, Eduardo Sabbatella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far I know, just coffee speaking with some physics
friends. WE ALL li
As far I know, just coffee speaking with some physics
friends. WE ALL live in multi dimensional world.
Indeed, if more then 3 dimensions exists, we exist in
them, also our computers. The thing is, our eyes only
see the first three ones.
I think you are talking about the God's computer ;-).
---
17 matches
Mail list logo
