On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:46:07AM -0500, Don Dailey wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 12:00 -0200, Mark Boon wrote:
What ticked me off with the cuckoo method is apparently it can loop
and a rehash is needed. Ouch, that better not happen very often!
The whole point is that this cost is
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 15:06 -0500, Don Dailey wrote:
Years ago A player in the chess
club kept beating me over the head with a non-standard
opening move that was difficult to refute. I got sick
of this, sat down in the privacy of my own home and
didn't get back up until I discovered the
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: zaterdag, januari 20, 2007 9:06 pm
Onderwerp: Re: [computer-go] an idea for a new measure of a computer
go program's rank.
Years ago A player in the chess
club kept beating me over the head with a
Hi Sylvain,
On 1/10/07, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So between the default level (8) and the level 16, there are 7% winning
difference at around 50%, which is significant, but do not change by far
the results Hiroshi posted. It is far less than 100 ELO right?
I did not measure the
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:55 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion in Go a game leaves the standard opening book very
quickly, usually early in the opening. There are so many ways to play
in the opening. If you opponent is trying to manipulate you into his
favourite joseki(the taisha
Hello Arend,
Unfortunately I don't have the log files anymore. I just remember that it
(at least one) was a position with a lot of stones (not a starting
position).
Sylvain
2007/1/20, Arend Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Sylvain,
On 1/10/07, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So between
I have such games. It was with a expermental version of Suzie, were Suzie
played quite aggressive/over optimistic. Gnu-Go calculated very long, but won
these games at the end completly
When Suzie plays sound and wins or looses only be a small margin, Gnu-Go plays
also with level 16 relative
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 15:34 -0700, Arend Bayer wrote:
Hi Don,
On 1/20/07, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If what you are saying is true, this is a waste of time.
They should not be able to produce better quality moves
than what they produce over the board.
Le dimanche 21 janvier 2007 01:23, Don Dailey a écrit :
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 15:34 -0700, Arend Bayer wrote:
Hi Don,
To put another perspective on it: If I had an hour for every move in a
tournament game, I might play good EGF 5d level instead of average EGF
4d. That's a big difference
