[computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Hi all, I am pleased to announce a binary release of current version of MoGo. It is specially designed for players but of course it may be interesting for some of you as a benchmark. You download it and see the instructions there: http://www.lri.fr/~gelly/MoGo.htm Of course, please feel free to

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread David Doshay
Well, it has been a pleasure and instructive for all of us! Good luck with whatever comes next. Cheers, David On 9, Sep 2007, at 12:20 PM, Sylvain Gelly wrote: I would also take this occasion to say goodbye to you all, and thank you for all the discussions. I now finished (and almost

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Brian Slesinsky
Congratulations. Are there any plans to release the source? Perhaps someone else will figure out how to port it. - Brian ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

[computer-go] Re: Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Hideki Kato
Sylvain Gelly: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unfortunately, only the linux version is available (for the moment?). I wanted to wait for the windows version to be available at the same time, but it is 2 times slower than the linux version(!!), so I decided not to distribute it for the moment. I use cygwin

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Sylvain Gelly
2007/9/9, Brian Slesinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Are there any plans to release the source? I don't think so. Plus, some will work on MoGo source code, so it is their decision, not mine. Perhaps someone else will figure out how to port it. Well, it actually builds and work on windows, only the

Re: [computer-go] Re: Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Sylvain Gelly
Try MinGW (and MSYS). MinGW has GCC ver. 4.2.1. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2435 Yes, I saw that and tried. But the thing is that MoGo use pthread library for multitreading, and, as far as I know, MinGW does not provide pthread (does it?). It is why I needed cygwin.

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Don Dailey
Thanks Sylvain, This is a wonderful gift to the computer go community! - Don On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 21:20 +0200, Sylvain Gelly wrote: Hi all, I am pleased to announce a binary release of current version of MoGo. It is specially designed for players but of course it may be interesting for

Re: [computer-go] CGOS Question

2007-09-09 Thread Don Dailey
CGOS uses Tromp/Taylor scoring exactly. That means if a stone is still on the board it is alive. Games must be fully played out. The cgos main page discusses rules and such. - Don On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 15:39 -0700, Phil G wrote: Don, Does CGOS count stones in atari as alive or

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Brian Slesinsky
On 9/9/07, Sylvain Gelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps someone else will figure out how to port it. Well, it actually builds and work on windows, only the speed is an issue. I should try if the speed is the same on linux with such an old compiler. My guess is that it is really a matter of

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Markus Enzenberger
when I run the Linux exeutable on my Fedora 8/Athlon XP, I get a coredump: $ mogo --9 --time 12 Load opening database opening succeed (nbEntries=618) (nbIllegalMoves removed 0) tried to open opening, success 1 Illegal instruction (core dumped) could it be that it is compiled for specific CPU

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Markus Enzenberger
when I run the Linux exeutable on my Fedora 8/Athlon XP, I get a I mean Fedora 7... - Markus ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread David Stafford
What are the options for someone who would like a dan-level opponent (even if it's 9x9) but doesn't have a Linux system currently? Are there choices other than MoGo? If not, I'm willing to build a Linux box but I have some questions: - Is a quad-core Xeon better for MoGo than a higher-clocked

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Don Dailey
I have no problem running on a core 2 duo Ubuntu linux (feisty fawn) It also runs with multiple threads. I tried 8 threads (even though I have only 2 cores) and it worked just fine. - Don On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 01:33 +0200, Cenny Wenner wrote: Runs like a charm on FC6 64bit, one core. How

Re: [computer-go] CGOS Question

2007-09-09 Thread Phil G
Thanks for the clarification; I thought somewhere I had read that with Tromp/Taylor rules stones in atari as considered dead. Gotta go fix my bot now. Phil - Original Message From: Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org Sent: Sunday, September 9,

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Yamato
It is a good news for all of us. I have no time to develop my Go program now, but I will use it as a local opponent when I come back again. Unfortunately, only the linux version is available (for the moment?). I wanted to wait for the windows version to be available at the same time, but it is 2

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Don Dailey
I'm a little confused. If I operate with no parameters it works ok, but if I do ./mogo --7 (for instance) it goes into some kind of self-training mode. It seems to do this no matter what parameter I use including setting the number of processes. If I go with no command line options, I

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread Darren Cook
What are the options for someone who ... doesn't have a Linux system currently? LiveCDs ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiveCD ) allow you to do a temporary linux installation. Of course, then you have to decide which one, and which distro. I would think any of those marked for general in this

Re: [computer-go] Binary release of MoGo

2007-09-09 Thread elife
Thanks Sylvain for this wonderful gift! Is there a option like gnugo's --capture-all-dead? In my test(./mogo --9 --time 1), seems mogo passed when not capture alldead stones. By the way, is --time 0.1 valid? ___ computer-go mailing list