David Doshay wrote:
Why would you use 6 of the 8 cores and not all 8?
Cheers,
David
It is the desktop machine of a colleague. He was running one long
computation on one core, and using it for mail, web browsing, etc. So I
left 2 cores to him.
Rémi
__
I just went through the process of getting my engine (Gonzo) up and
running on CGOS. I thought I'd share the experience as it wasn't
exactly plain sailing and others who may encounter similar problems in
the future may benefit.
My engine is written in Java and I run it from a Windows box. When I
At 04:31 PM 10/12/2007, you wrote:
How do I find the ones narrated in English?
not sure, i just found these things/
Do they exist?
yes
The
closest I could find was this one which is almost unwatchable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uArhCnJu7LM
all of the ones by her that i have seen a
From: David Doshay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Why would you use 6 of the 8 cores and not all 8?
... Perhaps it was the challenge of doing it with two cores tied behind his
back?
On 12, Oct 2007, at 3:41 PM, Hiroshi Yamashita wrote:
> I add some info about this match.
>
> Crazy Stone ran on Quad Co
Why would you use 6 of the 8 cores and not all 8?
Cheers,
David
On 12, Oct 2007, at 3:41 PM, Hiroshi Yamashita wrote:
I add some info about this match.
Crazy Stone ran on Quad Core (3.0Hz) x2 Mac, and used 6 core out of
8 core.
Remi said its speed was 30,000 playout/s on it. (at least in
How do I find the ones narrated in English? Do they exist? The
closest I could find was this one which is almost unwatchable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uArhCnJu7LM
On 10/12/07, Ray Tayek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:36 AM 10/12/2007, you wrote:
> >Chris Fant wrote:
> > > Ho can I fi
At 07:36 AM 10/12/2007, you wrote:
Chris Fant wrote:
> Ho can I find Go vids on youtube? Searching for "go" obviously
does nothing.
>
>
Atari was also a good keyword here. There it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt1FvPxmmfE
searching for: go baduk weiqi
returns a bunch.
---
vice-chair
Hi,
Thanks Remi for posting detail result. I add some info about this match.
Crazy Stone ran on Quad Core (3.0Hz) x2 Mac, and used 6 core out of 8 core.
Remi said its speed was 30,000 playout/s on it. (at least in first game)
KCConGUI is a commercial version of "Ginsei Igo 7" that is sold in Jap
Not so crazy after all.:)
On 10/12/07, David Fotland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at all the games and scored them with Many Faces and I agree with
> the result, 14 wins, 5 losses, and one unfinished early. It looks like
> Crazy stone is stronger than any traditional program at 19x1
I looked at all the games and scored them with Many Faces and I agree with
the result, 14 wins, 5 losses, and one unfinished early. It looks like
Crazy stone is stronger than any traditional program at 19x19.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Ian Osgood wrote:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Rémi Coulom wrote:
In case nobody noticed, Crazy Stone won a match against KCC Igo this
summer, with 15 wins and 4 losses. The match was organized by Hiroshi
Yamashita. The games can be found in the KGS archives.
http://www.gokgs.com/gameArchiv
On Oct 11, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Rémi Coulom wrote:
In case nobody noticed, Crazy Stone won a match against KCC Igo
this summer, with 15 wins and 4 losses. The match was organized by
Hiroshi Yamashita. The games can be found in the KGS archives.
http://www.gokgs.com/gameArchives.jsp?user=kccon
that just kills me every time i see the expression on yasuhiro's (?)
face. losing the 5 stones is one thing, losing the second eye is
brutal.
s.
- Original Message
From: Tapani Raiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:36:01 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-
Or weiqi.
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:29 AM, steve uurtamo wrote:
try baduk!
s.
- Original Message
From: Chris Fant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:04:23 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Former Deep Blue Rese
Chris Fant wrote:
> Ho can I find Go vids on youtube? Searching for "go" obviously does nothing.
>
>
Atari was also a good keyword here. There it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt1FvPxmmfE
--
Tapani Raiko, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, +358 50 5225750
http://www.cis.hut.fi/praiko/
_
try baduk!
s.
- Original Message
From: Chris Fant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:04:23 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Former Deep Blue Research working on Go
Ho can I find Go vids on youtube? Searching for "go" obviously does nothing.
On 10/12/
Ho can I find Go vids on youtube? Searching for "go" obviously does nothing.
On 10/12/07, steve uurtamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > So this doesn't get too lengthy I'll remove the stuff I'm not responding
> > to.
>
> no problem.
>
> > But why would it suddenly go "log" at so
> Hi Steve,
>
> So this doesn't get too lengthy I'll remove the stuff I'm not responding
> to.
no problem.
> But why would it suddenly go "log" at some point nearby? This is the
> same superstition people had in computer chess for decades! Everyone
> had this gut feeling based on nothing what
From: Dave Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Considering how monte carlo actually works, I think it's plausible
> to argue that it works best where the distance to endgame is small.
> For a 19x19 board, the playing speed may be only a factor of 4 worse,
> but the effective learning speed for an opening p
Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 21:15, Don Dailey a écrit :
> I appreciate the vote of confidence, but my point is that if you want
> some kind of "certified" rating CGOS is not a good choice. You can run
> anything on CGOS and claim anything. You could even substitute a
> strong human player, if you
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:32:44PM -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
>
> But what I had in mind in some kind of ratings agency where the
> conditions are controlled and everything is completely open.
>
> Here is what is required:
>
> 1. Someone with at least 2 equal DEDICATED computers plus a server.
>
Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 22:31, Christoph Birk a écrit :
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Don Dailey wrote:
> > But we had a 19x19 server and it WAS NOT interesting. Nobody seemed
> > willing to play on it.
>
> Maybe that has changed now.
> It was not interesting because there was only one competitive
> pr
Le vendredi 12 octobre 2007 06:10, Dave Dyer a écrit :
>
> Considering how monte carlo actually works, I think it's plausible
> to argue that it works best where the distance to endgame is small.
>
And for a player against Mogo this is very un-human feature on 19x19.
- Fuseki is done agaisnt a 1
23 matches
Mail list logo
