Has anyone applied the ideas in Modelling Uncertainty in the Game of Go by
Stern, Graepel, and MacKay?The paper can be found at:
http://research.microsoft.com/~dstern/papers/sterngraepelmackay04.pdf
It was quite a fascinating paper!
- George
___
This beast goes online in 2011. Better start lobbying now for some Mogo time.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32152
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
It looks like it hasn't scheduled any games for the last few hours.
David
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
Rémi Coulom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
I'll run tests to try to figure out how much strength is lost by
parallelization (ie, what is the winning rate of 10,000 sequential
playouts vs 1,000 playouts over 10 processors). Hideki ran similar tests
against GNU Go, and found 25 Elo loss with 4 CPUs. So
This beast goes online in 2011. Better start lobbying now for some Mogo
time.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32152
By coincidence I was looking at the Top 500 list yesterday and the top
machine already does petaflop (peak) performance [1]. I wonder how many
playouts/second Mogo
Raises hand. Chinese rules version for 9x9 and 13x13 would be quite helpful if
that's what you are offering. Different komi would be fine.
- Dave Hillis
-Original Message-
From: Darren Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 10:33 pm
Darren Cook wrote:
do you have anything published?
I will do this commercially, i.e., publish when it will be ready and
complete. Since currently I am working on projects with a higher
priority (among them: joseki books), you need to be very patient, I am
afraid. [Unless (email me for
