In message 20100104070048.50...@gmx.net, Ingo Althöfer
3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de writes
Hello all, especially hello Nick,
http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/future.html
are there already plans for KGS bot tournaments
in 2010?
Yes. I must set up a schedule this week. I plan to continue last
year's
Petr Baudis wrote:
I forgot to ask about another unclear thing in your paper - you say that
in simulations, you use the continuity feature. Does that effectively
mean distance-to-last-move feature with just two levels, one for d=3,
another for d3?
Yes. I believe I called it contiguity.
Rémi
Petr Baudis wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Rémi Coulom wrote:
The problem is that I am not using the same set of features for
biasing the tree, and for playouts. Playouts only use fast light
features. The tree part uses slow complex features. In particular, I
use patterns of
Le 04/01/2010 à 14:19, Nick Wedd a écrit :
I have discussed these extra events in the past, and received feedback
here; which, unfortunately, I have forgotten. So please, anyone who is
interested, make your suggestions now.
As a spectator i would like an Hanh tournament on 19x19, not too
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:19:25PM +, Nick Wedd wrote:
In message 20100104070048.50...@gmx.net, Ingo Althöfer
3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de writes
Hello all, especially hello Nick,
http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/future.html
are there already plans for KGS bot tournaments
in 2010?
Yes. I
In message 201001041753.46668.alain.baecker...@laposte.net, Alain
Baeckeroot alain.baecker...@laposte.net writes
Le 04/01/2010 à 14:19, Nick Wedd a écrit :
I have discussed these extra events in the past, and received feedback
here; which, unfortunately, I have forgotten. So please, anyone
On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
I don't think Hahn tournament would be that interesting, it would
require some extensive modifications of especially the top programs
and involve a lot of work in the tournament setup as well.
I agree -- the Hahn game changes the victory
Hi Nick,
... So please, anyone who is
interested, make your suggestions now.
I have a really exotic proposal:
what about one pair-go bot tournament in 2010 ?
A pair consists of two bots A and B from different programmers.
In a game, a pair takes one side (Black or White),
and A and B are
Le 04/01/2010 à 18:09, Petr Baudis a écrit :
I don't think Hahn tournament would be that interesting,
As a physicist i like to experiment first, and think later,
to understand what happened, which obviously was not foreseen ;-)
I believe it will reveal some hidden aspect of the stronger engines,
Hi all,
Alain Baeckeroot wrote:
As a physicist i like to experiment first, and think later,
to understand what happened, which obviously was not foreseen ;-)
This attitude I like very much, being an experimental mathematician.
I believe it will reveal some hidden aspect of the stronger
Interesting is in the eye of the beholder, but I think a Hahn tournment would
be interesting.
Everyone with an MC bot could easily modify it to play by setting it
(carefully) not to resign, and changing it to try to maximize average score
rather than probability of win. That's really just a
Petr Baudis wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Rémi Coulom wrote:
The problem is that I am not using the same set of features for
biasing the tree, and for playouts. Playouts only use fast light
features. The tree part uses slow complex features. In particular, I
use patterns of
12 matches
Mail list logo
