(unofficial) Final result can be seen
https://twitter.com/UgenNihonkiin/status/898109924604919808
Thanks,
Hiroshi Yamashita
- Original Message -
From: ""Ingo Althöfer"" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:08 PM
Subject: Re:
On 17.08.2017 21:35, Darren Cook wrote:
The machine-learning methods AlphaGo uses are applicable to practically
anything."
They (alone) are not good for guaranteed avoiding of mistakes (as is
achieved by theorems), or for guaranteed permanent execution by their
software, hardware, power
In New Scientist, 3 June 2017, p.42-43, there is an interview with
Kasparov (who has just published a book about his defeat by Deep Blue),
where he says "Deep Blue is the end and AlphaGo the beginning", and
explains:
"I'm sure some things were learned about parallel processing... but the
real
Dear Hiroshi,
thank you for the results and the sgf data.
Congratulations to Zen team, including Hideki!
Cheers, Ingo.
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. August 2017 um 11:12 Uhr
> Von: "Hiroshi Yamashita"
> An: computer-go@computer-go.org
> Betreff: Re: [Computer-go] CGI won
Has to be truly far. Even in chess best estimates are that current
computers are still few hundred ELO points away from perfect. In chess on
can make estimates based what draw rates current best ones would get
against perfect play. Loads of guess work but still reasonable. In go
difference must
Zen won.
Final game and semi final "Zen vs FineArt" sgf are,
(;GM[1]SZ[19]
PB[CGI]
PW[DeepZenGo]
DT[2017-08-17]RE[W+R]KM[7.5]RU[Chinese]
;B[pq];W[pd];B[cp];W[dd];B[qf];W[nc];B[md];W[mc];B[ql];W[ep]
;B[gq];W[cq];B[jp];W[cn];B[bq];W[dq];B[do];W[bp];B[bo];W[co]
Hi Ingo,
Zen beated FineArt in semi final.
Final is CGI vs Zen.
Live is available in FoxGo.
Thanks,
Hiroshi Yamashita
- Original Message -
From: ""Ingo Althöfer"" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:02 PM
Subject: Re:
Dear Hiroshi,
thank you for our information.
Can you please keep us informed about the
results from the final tournament?
Thank you in advance,
Ingo.
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. August 2017 um 02:59 Uhr
> Von: "Hiroshi Yamashita"
> An: computer-go@computer-go.org
> Betreff:
Another way of seeing it: the evaluation of a program that can play
perfect would tend to give score close to 100% or 0 %.
As far as I know Alphago would stay close to 50% for a long time just
like most other programs (but with much higher correlation with the
actual outcome of course).