What I'm saying is that the patent is functionally meaningless. Who is
there to sue?
Moreover, there is no enforceable patent on the broad class of algorithms
that could reproduce these results. No?
s.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 4:16 AM Jim O'Flaherty Tysvm for the clarification, Tokumoto.
>
> On
Tysvm for the clarification, Tokumoto.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, 8:02 PM 甲斐徳本 What's insane about it?
> To me, what Jim O'Flaherty stated is common sense in the field of patents,
> and any patent attorney would attest to that. If I may add, Jim's last
> sentence should read "Google's patent
