and higher confidence. I could believe that they
have a proof that the algorithm is scalable in computing power... but not
necessarily that it is scalable against the problem of beating a human.
MC/UCT is provably scalable up to perfect play.
/Dan Andersson
Firstly.. I don't know
Don Dailey skrev:
I have looked at Lisaac a bit. It does seem to be pretty close to C/C++
in performance. I'm all for a prototype based OO that fits the systems
programming niche. It seems heavily influences by Eiffel and
Self/Smalltalk. Since it actually emits C code it's not truly faster
Don Dailey skrev:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 09:24 -0800, Zach Tellman wrote:
There are few languages other than these that offer reasonable
performance, not worse than 2X slower than C, but they tend
to be
memory hogs. Java is one of them. I cannot imagine
Don Dailey skrev:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:13 +0100, Dan Andersson wrote:
If one takes the position that bugs have a pretty significant impact
on
the strength of a program (A position I agree with) one could be
pretty
forgiving about the speed of execution of an algorithm if it is
written
