It has achieved that goal, but the further goal of getting AIs to explain and
teach is still out there.
Arthur
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 1:09 AM, hamburg.de wrote:
>
> So Computer-go achieved its goal and we can close this list?
>
>
>> On Jun 7, 2017, at 15:33, Erik van
I used Firefox on mac/yosemite and it worked fine.
Arthur
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 5:21 PM, Michael Alford wrote:
>
> I've tried Firefox and Safari on Mac, and Firefox and Chrome on Debian. I
> have used the link and accessed the page from the main page. In all
> instances the
> Somehow my neural net has a blur at "j" and "y”.
That must get yollj awkward at times!
:)
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
Thanks for the tip. I agree and I have no intention to misbehave.
Arthur
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Petri Pitkanen
> wrote:
>
> Yes scraping for large amounts of data from a smallish server is not really
> polite. May overload the server. Besides quite
Thank you Josef for that script.
>
> If you want to download more players, you need to search through opponents of
> players you know. But do not spam the kgs server too much please :-)
>
Point taken, I would not want to spoil the kgs experience for users.
I think a few hundred a day would be
Hello,
I would be interested for research purposes in getting lots of game sgfs of
lower-ranked players, to contrast with the high dan and pro games that
get put into collections. Even kyu games. I was thinking of getting them
from kgs archives.
I wonder if anyone already has a script that could
Would the game end after two unintentional passes?
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Ingo Althöfer <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the next Computer Olympiad has been dated.
> It will take place in Leiden (NL), from June 27, 2016 to July 03, 2016.
>
> I want to propose a new Go
With 8 hashes per position, the chance of two different boards
producing a different set of hashes but
the same canonical hash is greater than 1/2^64, because there will be
a bias in the choice of canonical
hashes - toward numerically lower numbers, for instance.
I think.
Arthur
On Dec