Re: [Computer-go] Notes from the Asilomar Conference on Beneficial AI

2017-02-09 Thread Richard J Lorentz
Thanks for the interesting link. Indeed, some good reading there. One quote that I've seen various versions of a number of times now: " More interesting for the rest of us, AlphaGo is playing moves and styles that all human masters had dismissed as stupid centuries ago." Can any one point me

[Computer-go] Tygem

2017-02-06 Thread Richard J Lorentz
Can anyone tell me a bit more about the go server Tygem? I am intrigued by the apparent level of players that participate. Who runs this server? Are serious games and/or tournaments played on it? What sort of time controls are typically used there? Apparently professionals play on it (as did

Re: [computer-go] First ever win of a computer against a pro 9P as black (game of Go, 9x9).

2009-10-26 Thread Richard J. Lorentz
How things changes. You would never hear a comment like Remark c) below concerning the old alpha-beta chess engines. Olivier Teytaud wrote: Dear all, For information, our Taiwanese partners(**) for a ANR grant have organized public demonstration games between MoGoTW (based on MoGo

Re: [computer-go] List of contestants for US Go Congress tournament

2008-06-26 Thread Richard J. Lorentz
Thanks for that. It's nice to know that I'm not the only one. David Doshay wrote: I think we all understand trying to get code done for an event. I gave up any hope of that with SlugGo a little while ago. Now I am only doing parameter tweaking (hunting in too many dimensions, all in the

Re: [computer-go] Former Deep Blue Research working on Go

2007-10-10 Thread Richard J. Lorentz
Of no particular importance I suppose, but did any one else get the impression after looking at the picture (and the way he is holding the stone) that he is not a regular go player? Chris Fant wrote: I'm just now reading the article. Monte Carlo techniques have recently had success in Go

Re: Fast data structures explained! (was Re: [computer-go] Go datastructures)

2007-07-20 Thread Richard J. Lorentz
Peter Drake wrote: On Jul 20, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Jason House wrote: I thought he was using the disjoint set! I'll recheck. Well written disjoint sets average out to nearly O(1) operations for everything. Yes -- O(log* n) to be precise, ... At the risk of being accused of serious

Re: [computer-go] CPU for UTC

2007-02-22 Thread Richard J. Lorentz
Thanks! That one CPU comparison is very helpful. So, indeed, there is a lot more to worry about these days than simple clock speed. Has anybody else done similar comparisons? :) P.S. I'll almost surely pass on overclocking, but I had heard rumors that current CPUs were running well under

Re: [computer-go] MC approach (was: Monte Carlo (MC) vs Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC))

2007-02-07 Thread Richard J. Lorentz
terry mcintyre wrote: If I recall correctly, someone spoke of constraining the opening moves to the 3rd,4th,and 5th lines in the absence of nearby stones, or something to that effect. What was the impact of this experiment? For what it's worth, I tried a number of experiments along these