Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
59.43 X longer.
So if we plot 9X9 rank vs time, maybe we have a straight line :)
ELO vs size of the tree
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
59.43 X longer.
So if we plot 9X9 rank vs time,
Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
Alain Baeckeroot wrote:
Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and
The study is running very well. We have 32 computers being used so
far, some participants are providing 2 (or even more) computers.
It would be great to get even more as we get into higher levels, as it
will take a LOT of power to get a lot of games when each games takes 2
or 3 hours or
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
The study is running very well. We have 32 computers being used so
far, some participants are providing 2 (or even more) computers.
It would be great to get even more as we get into higher levels, as it
will take a LOT of power to get a
It would be great to get even more as we get into higher levels, as it
will take a LOT of power to get a lot of games when each games takes 2
or 3 hours or more.
Is it possible to have a indicative time and memory consumption at each
level, for 9x9 and 13x13 study ?
I guess this does
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
59.43 X longer.
Some possible hypothesis:
1. Computer more loaded during early games?
2. Mogo resigns earlier at longer levels.
3. Mogo's stop
Hi Don,
2008/2/21, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to level
11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes 59.43 X
longer.
Mogo's stop early heuristic works better at longer levels.
That is actually very
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:08:56PM -0500, Don Dailey wrote:
It's also interesting how the graph up to level 11 seems to form 2 very
straight lines, almost as if they were connected at an angle.
This must be a by-product of how we started the test. We played only
the first 4 levels as we
--- Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's also interesting how the graph up to level 11
seems to form 2 very
straight lines, almost as if they were connected at
an angle.
This must be a by-product of how we started the
test. We played only
the first 4 levels as we were testing the
11 matches
Mail list logo
