van Engelen <ich.bun...@gmail.com>
To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org>
Sent: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 12:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo rollout nakade patterns?
@Gian-Carlo Pascutto, thanks! but identifying the shapes is not the problem=)
@Brain Sheppard, Sorry it was
On 31.01.2017 16:39, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
http://senseis.xmp.net/?BasicLivingEyeShapes
Warning: these do not include any living eye shapes with inside stones,
nor specialities on the edge or in the corner.
--
robert jasiek
___
Computer-go
ake less than 1% of total
> time. Any implementation that achieves that goal will make a noticeable
> difference to strength.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roel van Engelen <ich.bun...@gmail.com>
> To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org>
> Sent: Tue, Jan 31,
h.
-Original Message-
From: Roel van Engelen <ich.bun...@gmail.com>
To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org>
Sent: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 10:42 am
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo rollout nakade patterns?
@Brain Sheppard
Thanks that is a really useful explanation!
the way
On 31-01-17 16:32, Roel van Engelen wrote:
> @Brain Sheppard
> Thanks that is a really useful explanation!
> the way you state: "and therefore a 8192-sized pattern set will identify
> all potential nakade." seems to indicate this is a known pattern set?
> could i find some more information on it
discovery by the Mogo team.
>
> Note that there are often subtle differences for your program compared to
> the published papers.
>
> Best,
> Brian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf
> Of Gian-Carl
Finally, somebody asks about the nature of those 8192 patterns.(pardon the
Nature pun)
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
e that there are often subtle differences for your program compared to the
published papers.
Best,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of
Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:05 AM
To: computer-go@
On 23-01-17 20:10, Brian Sheppard via Computer-go wrote:
> only captures of up to 9 stones can be nakade.
I don't really understand this.
http://senseis.xmp.net/?StraightThree
Both constructing this shape and playing the vital point are not
captures. How can you detect the nakade (and play at a
On 23.01.2017 19:00, terry mcintyre via Computer-go wrote:
nakade involves creating a shape (such as three in a row or a bulky five)
such that, if captured, it would only form one eye, given the proper placement.
Nakade has been defined (e.g., several times by me) reasonably well, but
for
.
-Original Message-
From: terry mcintyre via Computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org>
To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org>
Sent: Mon, Jan 23, 2017 1:14 pm
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo rollout nakade patterns?
I speculate: nakade involves creating a shape (such as th
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } I speculate: nakade involves creating a shape (such as three in a
row or a bulky five) such that, if captured, it would only
I am trying to re-create the fast rollout policy as described by deepMind
but got stuck on the nakade patterns:
"Nakade, # of patterns 8192: Move matches a nakade pattern at captured
stone"
the "at captured stone" confuses me, my first thought is: "this is only
computed if stones have been
13 matches
Mail list logo
