Since patterns are correlated with each other, the gamma sets are
specific to the pattern set used. Since more patterns are used in the
tree, itrequires a separate set of gammas than the in-tree search.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 16, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Jacques Basaldúa
wrote:
> Petr Bau
Jacques Basaldúa wrote:
> Petr Baudis wrote:
> > I wonder now, do you use separate set of gammas for simulations and
node
> > biasing? Since I've found that the performance seems very bad if I
don't
> > include some time-expensive features, since the gammas are then very
> > off; I will p
> Petr Baudis wrote:
> > I wonder now, do you use separate set of gammas for simulations and
node
> > biasing? Since I've found that the performance seems very bad if I
don't
> > include some time-expensive features, since the gammas are then very
> > off; I will probably simply generate two ga
Petr Baudis wrote:
I wonder now, do you use separate set of gammas for simulations and node
biasing? Since I've found that the performance seems very bad if I don't
include some time-expensive features, since the gammas are then very
off; I will probably simply generate two gamma sets, but perhap
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:46:54PM +0100, Rémi Coulom wrote:
> Petr Baudis wrote:
> > How do you (e.g. CrazyStone) solve the issue? Or do you perform
> >explicit unpruning by sorting the nodes instead of biasing them?
>
> I bias them too. I use move probability, not move gamma, which
> norm
Petr Baudis wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:46:54PM +0100, Rémi Coulom wrote:
I bias them too. I use move probability, not move gamma, which
normalizes the value between 0 and 1. I multiply this probability by
a constant, divide by the number of playouts, and add it to the move
score.
I see,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:46:54PM +0100, Rémi Coulom wrote:
> I bias them too. I use move probability, not move gamma, which
> normalizes the value between 0 and 1. I multiply this probability by
> a constant, divide by the number of playouts, and add it to the move
> score.
I see, but the consta
Petr Baudis wrote:
Hi!
How would you recommend to bias nodes in the tree according to pattern
strengths, when the pattern strength can be in (0,inf)? (I'm using this
for Remi's pattern ELO model, but I guess other fuzzy pattern values face
similar problems.)
I have node values in the form
Hi!
How would you recommend to bias nodes in the tree according to pattern
strengths, when the pattern strength can be in (0,inf)? (I'm using this
for Remi's pattern ELO model, but I guess other fuzzy pattern values face
similar problems.)
I have node values in the form of W / N (wins / vis
