Re: [computer-go] Fuego technical report

2009-05-07 Thread Michael Williams

I found an error in the documentation:

===
void GoUctCommands::CmdParamPlayer ( GtpCommand  cmd ) 
===
Get and set GoUctPlayer parameters.

This command is compatible with the GoGui analyze command type param.

Parameters:
   auto_param  See GoUctPlayer::AutoParam
   early_pass  See GoUctPlayer::EarlyPass
   ignore_clock  See GoUctPlayer::IgnoreClock
   reuse_subtree  See GoUctPlayer::ReuseSubtree
   use_root_filter  See GoUctPlayer::UseRootFilter
   max_games  See GoUctPlayer::MaxGames
   resign_min_games  See GoUctPlayer::ResignMinGames
   resign_threshold  See GoUctPlayer::ResignThreshold
   search_mode playout|uct|one_ply  See GoUctPlayer::SearchMode
===

The last line should read:
   search_mode playout_policy|uct|one_ply  See GoUctPlayer::SearchMode





Martin Mueller wrote:

Our technical report describing the Fuego framework is now available on
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/research/techreports/2009/TR09-08.php

I will probably make at least one more revision, so all feedback and 
suggestions are welcome.


Thank you

Martin
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/



___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Fuego technical report

2009-05-06 Thread Michael Williams

How do you set the number of threads that you want Fuego to use?  Does the 
windows version support multiple threads?



Michael Williams wrote:
Very nice.  I do have one suggestion for Fuego.  Make use of the ability 
to filter certain root moves out of the UCT tree to remove symmetrically 
equivalent moves.  Or if it is not cost-prohibitive, throughout the tree.



Martin Mueller wrote:

Our technical report describing the Fuego framework is now available on
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/research/techreports/2009/TR09-08.php

I will probably make at least one more revision, so all feedback and 
suggestions are welcome.


Thank you

Martin





___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Fuego technical report

2009-05-05 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
Martin Mueller wrote:
 Our technical report describing the Fuego framework is now available on
 http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/research/techreports/2009/TR09-08.php

 I will probably make at least one more revision, so all feedback and
 suggestions are welcome.

On page 2, the report says

| The reference MCTS implementation by Dailey [6] provides a very useful
| starting point, but is far from a competitive system.

But reference [6] is to a description of a non-tree-search program.

-M-
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Fuego technical report

2009-05-05 Thread Michael Williams
Very nice.  I do have one suggestion for Fuego.  Make use of the ability to filter certain root moves out of the UCT tree to remove symmetrically equivalent 
moves.  Or if it is not cost-prohibitive, throughout the tree.



Martin Mueller wrote:

Our technical report describing the Fuego framework is now available on
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/research/techreports/2009/TR09-08.php

I will probably make at least one more revision, so all feedback and 
suggestions are welcome.


Thank you

Martin


___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


[computer-go] Fuego technical report

2009-05-04 Thread Martin Mueller

Our technical report describing the Fuego framework is now available on
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/research/techreports/2009/TR09-08.php

I will probably make at least one more revision, so all feedback and  
suggestions are welcome.


Thank you

Martin
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Fuego technical report

2009-05-04 Thread Jason House

Overall, it's a good read.

Nitpicks:
 • The scalability graphs need to be clearer. Maybe add a caption or  
change the single-threaded label? I looked at the graphs first and  
took a bit to figure out why single-threaded outperformed all else.
 • The RAVE section wasn't all too clear. I think it tried to  
explain too much or tried too hard to avoid math.
 • The scalability graphs aren't very informative once the win rate  
gets too high. It'd be better if the reference had something like four  
seconds per move instead of one
 • The placement of graphs at the end felt awkward, but it may be  
the best place for them since I believe the paper's goal is ease of  
reading. Maybe make the references to the graphs less explicit in the  
text?



Sent from my iPhone

On May 4, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Martin Mueller mmuel...@cs.ualberta.ca  
wrote:


Our technical report describing the Fuego framework is now available  
on

http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/research/techreports/2009/TR09-08.php

I will probably make at least one more revision, so all feedback and  
suggestions are welcome.


Thank you

   Martin
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/