Thank you Don for pointing me to the exact super ko moves
and - of cause - for CGOS!
> You said Game 334565 has several KO's in it. But there were no KO
> violations allowed. If so, where were they?
Sorry, wrong understanding by me. It had several simple ko's
at the same time. I thought the los
CGOS uses positional superko.
if 97. B A5 is played, the board configuration would match
the position immediately after 89. B H5 was played.
- Don
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 03:48 +0200, Heiner Spies wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> who would be so kind as to tell me what's wrong
> with the attempted moves
In Game 334564, it's also not a server error - but it's an amazing
superko.
If 101. B g5 were allowed, then it would exactly match the position
after 71. B e6.
After 71. B e6 was played a huge black group was captured, then a huge
white group was captured and yet history repeated itself.
You
Hi all,
who would be so kind as to tell me what's wrong
with the attempted moves of gg_mirror at the end
of the attached files? They have been judged loss
due to illegal moves and contain this comment:
black player error - KO attempted move: A5 // resp. G5 //
Is that some superko rule strikin