Re: [computer-go] playing strength of programmers

2007-09-12 Thread Don Dailey
Sometimes players of roughly equal strength are strong for very
different
reasons.

I've known chess players that were about expert strength that knew very
little about the game,  but they were very strong with tactics and
rarely made a mistake.   I also knew other player about the same
strength that were amazingly weak at tactics but really understood
strategy and played solidly.

So I'll bet the type of player you are is just as important as how
strong you are.

- Don


On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 13:16 +0100, Jacques BasaldĂșa wrote:
> I agree with all those who say it is important, but there is some 
> precision to be made:
> 
> As a player you are as strong as your weakest link because you are 
> punished for your mistakes.
> 
> As a programmer you are a strong as your strongest link. You know that 
> mistakes are just mistakes, as long as you can identify them, your 
> program won't do them.
> 
> My advice is: Read about advanced strategical concepts (in books, not 
> only sensei) and watch dan players until you understand what they do. 
> Don't worry about your own level. It will increase anyway, but you will 
> still be beaten by players who know less than you but are way more solid.
> 
> Understanding dan level play is some orders of magnitude easier than 
> playing dan level.
> 
> Jacques.
> ___
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] playing strength of programmers

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques BasaldĂșa
I agree with all those who say it is important, but there is some 
precision to be made:


As a player you are as strong as your weakest link because you are 
punished for your mistakes.


As a programmer you are a strong as your strongest link. You know that 
mistakes are just mistakes, as long as you can identify them, your 
program won't do them.


My advice is: Read about advanced strategical concepts (in books, not 
only sensei) and watch dan players until you understand what they do. 
Don't worry about your own level. It will increase anyway, but you will 
still be beaten by players who know less than you but are way more solid.


Understanding dan level play is some orders of magnitude easier than 
playing dan level.


Jacques.
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] playing strength of programmers

2007-09-11 Thread steve uurtamo
There are some subtle distinctions to make
when thinking about slack moves, though.  Some
strong moves simply solidify a connection enough
to make a large region of the board come under
more influence to be used later.  This is really
difficult to measure, because these moves often
can serve several purposes, depending upon what
happens later in the game.  They aren't necessary,
they don't immediately threaten anything, and they're
not providing life for a group under threat of death.
Instead, they are just setting the stage for changing the
direction of play later.  They may look like slack moves,
but they aren't, and it can be difficult to time them,
much less find them.

Some stronger players can laugh at my description now.  :)

s.

- Original Message 
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:45:18 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] playing strength of programmers

1) The strongest players I've known personally have been extremely
articulate about what they were doing & why; one used to practice
explaining every move he made to his opponent.

2) I'm not that strong, myself--so you may take this with suitable
seasoning. I think the main advantage of personal go strength is having
enough experience of the game that you have a sense of the size of the
tree-space, the critical importance of correct move-order & of the need to
prune that search-tree. Anyone who thinks his program can afford to make a
slack move... just doesn't understand the game's requirements.

Forrest Curo


-
This email was sent using AIS WebMail.
http://www.americanis.net/


___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/





   

Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's 
Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] playing strength of programmers

2007-09-11 Thread forrestc
1) The strongest players I've known personally have been extremely
articulate about what they were doing & why; one used to practice
explaining every move he made to his opponent.

2) I'm not that strong, myself--so you may take this with suitable
seasoning. I think the main advantage of personal go strength is having
enough experience of the game that you have a sense of the size of the
tree-space, the critical importance of correct move-order & of the need to
prune that search-tree. Anyone who thinks his program can afford to make a
slack move... just doesn't understand the game's requirements.

Forrest Curo


-
This email was sent using AIS WebMail.
http://www.americanis.net/


___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/