Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread Jason House
I like the idea of using Bayesian ELO ratings instead. They should  
adapt better and faster. It would give better rank confidence than the  
current k factor. For example, kartofel would have kept a low  
confidence.


Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 10, 2008, at 11:51 AM, David Fotland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
games.com wrote:


First, thank you very much, Don, for giving us a reliable 19x19  
server.


Please consider increasing the time a program stays on the list  
until it
ages off.  I guess you drop programs from the ratings page after  
some time
that depends on the number of games they have played.  Since 19x19  
games
take 4 times longs, it seems you should allow four times as much  
time to age
off the list, for the same number of games.  I like seeing the top  
program's

results a little longer.

It would be nice if a program can get into position more quickly.   
Since the
games take longer, it can take several days to climb up from the  
initial
1200 to 2000, especially if there is an early loos.  Does it make  
sense to
set the initial k value a little higher, or to set the initial  
rating to

1500 instead of 1200?

-David


___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread Don Dailey
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 14:15 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
 I will also modify the server so that losses by anchors don't count.  

Woops,  what I mean is losses on TIME won't count.  They will still
count if the opponent loses but not if the anchor loses.  

- Don


___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread steve uurtamo
one more thing -- you may want to keep anchors from playing
one another.  at least, i seem to recall that i saw two anchors
playing one another.  it can't (by definition) affect anyone's ratings,
so... probably pointless for them to do so, right?

s.


On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 14:15 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
 I will also modify the server so that losses by anchors don't count.

 Woops,  what I mean is losses on TIME won't count.  They will still
 count if the opponent loses but not if the anchor loses.

 - Don


 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread Don Dailey
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 14:35 -0700, steve uurtamo wrote:
 one more thing -- you may want to keep anchors from playing
 one another.  at least, i seem to recall that i saw two anchors
 playing one another.  it can't (by definition) affect anyone's ratings,
 so... probably pointless for them to do so, right?

Yes, that is something I have been planning to do for a long time but
haven't bothered since previously we rarely had more than 1 anchor at a
time.

- Don


 
 s.
 
 
 On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 14:15 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
  I will also modify the server so that losses by anchors don't count.
 
  Woops,  what I mean is losses on TIME won't count.  They will still
  count if the opponent loses but not if the anchor loses.
 
  - Don
 
 
  ___
  computer-go mailing list
  computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
 

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread steve uurtamo
david, is mfgo-12-0805-2c really over 400 ELO better
than mfgo-11, as cgos seems to suggest?  or is mfgo11
still rising up into place?

thanks,

s.


On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, David Fotland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 First, thank you very much, Don, for giving us a reliable 19x19 server.

 Please consider increasing the time a program stays on the list until it
 ages off.  I guess you drop programs from the ratings page after some time
 that depends on the number of games they have played.  Since 19x19 games
 take 4 times longs, it seems you should allow four times as much time to age
 off the list, for the same number of games.  I like seeing the top program's
 results a little longer.

 It would be nice if a program can get into position more quickly.  Since the
 games take longer, it can take several days to climb up from the initial
 1200 to 2000, especially if there is an early loos.  Does it make sense to
 set the initial k value a little higher, or to set the initial rating to
 1500 instead of 1200?

 -David


 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread Don Dailey
Here are the current ratings using bayeselo of program on the 19x19
server.   I have a script in place so that I can update this at will and
I may run this every few  hours or so, probably starting tomorrow.  

  http://cgos.boardspace.net/19x19/bayes_19x19.html

- Don




On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 08:51 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
 First, thank you very much, Don, for giving us a reliable 19x19 server.
 
 Please consider increasing the time a program stays on the list until it
 ages off.  I guess you drop programs from the ratings page after some time
 that depends on the number of games they have played.  Since 19x19 games
 take 4 times longs, it seems you should allow four times as much time to age
 off the list, for the same number of games.  I like seeing the top program's
 results a little longer.  
 
 It would be nice if a program can get into position more quickly.  Since the
 games take longer, it can take several days to climb up from the initial
 1200 to 2000, especially if there is an early loos.  Does it make sense to
 set the initial k value a little higher, or to set the initial rating to
 1500 instead of 1200?
 
 -David
 
 
 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


RE: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread David Fotland
Thanks.  This is more like what I would expect.  About 80 elo points between
mfgo 1 cpu and 2 cpu (like other programs), and many faces 11 a little
higher rated.

Does anyone know whose program is rz-74?  I'm trying to catch mogo,
crazystone, and leela by September, and I'm curious if there will be other
strong competition.

David

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Dailey
 Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 7:02 PM
 To: computer-go
 Subject: Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions
 
 Here are the current ratings using bayeselo of program on the 19x19
 server.   I have a script in place so that I can update this at will
 and
 I may run this every few  hours or so, probably starting tomorrow.
 
   http://cgos.boardspace.net/19x19/bayes_19x19.html
 
 - Don
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 08:51 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
  First, thank you very much, Don, for giving us a reliable 19x19
 server.
 
  Please consider increasing the time a program stays on the list until
 it
  ages off.  I guess you drop programs from the ratings page after some
 time
  that depends on the number of games they have played.  Since 19x19
 games
  take 4 times longs, it seems you should allow four times as much time
 to age
  off the list, for the same number of games.  I like seeing the top
 program's
  results a little longer.
 
  It would be nice if a program can get into position more quickly.
 Since the
  games take longer, it can take several days to climb up from the
 initial
  1200 to 2000, especially if there is an early loos.  Does it make
 sense to
  set the initial k value a little higher, or to set the initial rating
 to
  1500 instead of 1200?
 
  -David
 
 
  ___
  computer-go mailing list
  computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
 
 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions

2008-08-10 Thread Don Dailey
You will notice that no program has a great deal of confidence.  Even
Gnugo the anchor is plus or minus 50 ELO.  

I combined ALL Gnugo anchors into 1 entity for rating purposes.  It
appears on the charts as Gnugo-3.7.10-a0  and does not have a
cross-table entry.  

I also did the one time removal of all games lost on time for the 19x19
server.  I purge everything including the SGF files for those games.
Most of them had no moves played or perhaps only 1 move.  

- Don


On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 22:01 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
 Here are the current ratings using bayeselo of program on the 19x19
 server.   I have a script in place so that I can update this at will and
 I may run this every few  hours or so, probably starting tomorrow.  
 
   http://cgos.boardspace.net/19x19/bayes_19x19.html
 
 - Don
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 08:51 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
  First, thank you very much, Don, for giving us a reliable 19x19 server.
  
  Please consider increasing the time a program stays on the list until it
  ages off.  I guess you drop programs from the ratings page after some time
  that depends on the number of games they have played.  Since 19x19 games
  take 4 times longs, it seems you should allow four times as much time to age
  off the list, for the same number of games.  I like seeing the top program's
  results a little longer.  
  
  It would be nice if a program can get into position more quickly.  Since the
  games take longer, it can take several days to climb up from the initial
  1200 to 2000, especially if there is an early loos.  Does it make sense to
  set the initial k value a little higher, or to set the initial rating to
  1500 instead of 1200?
  
  -David
  
  
  ___
  computer-go mailing list
  computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
 
 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/