Re: [Computer-go] Mailing list working?

> It has achieved /that/ goal, but the further goal of getting AIs to explain > and > teach is still out there. Or just to reach the same level, with less computational effort (either the training stage, or the playing engine), is an interesting challenge, that is likely to teach us something

Re: [Computer-go] Mailing list working?

It has achieved that goal, but the further goal of getting AIs to explain and teach is still out there. Arthur > On Jun 8, 2017, at 1:09 AM, hamburg.de wrote: > > So Computer-go achieved its goal and we can close this list? > > >> On Jun 7, 2017, at 15:33, Erik van

Re: [Computer-go] DeepMind's Victory over Ke Jie

1) triumphed over a particular boardgame, perhaps. 2) this has been true since the early days of Monte Carlo go bots -- it tends to result in a higher winning probability when the focus is on... winning probability. People have tried to make bots that focus on points instead, but trying to win by