It is M$ SOP. If M$ can't develop a better product and they can't force
you to be acquired, they will pay others to beat you out of business.
That is how Gates succeeded and built M# into the giant it is today.
Hopefully, this won't work with Google. If not unethical, then truly an
ugly business
Plus it seems like corporate suicide for News Corp. If I don't find it on
Google it doesn't exist. FOX and the WSJ just announced that they are going
out of business to a major portion of the world. This should be good for a
5% drop in the value of these properties day one.
On Wed, Nov 25,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:32 AM, John Duncan Yoyo
johnduncany...@gmail.com wrote:
FOX and the WSJ just announced that they are going
out of business to a major portion of the world. Â This should be good for a
5% drop in the value of these properties day one.
I have no problem whatsoever
In Outlook 2003 on Vista HP, I'm testing BCCs to multiple addresses.
The usage is a distribution list and I want to preserve privacy of the
list members' email addresses.
I want the received TO field to be empty. But, when I send BCCs only
and leave TO (and CC) empty, somehow the received
I don't use Outlook. But in general, the way to do it is to send the
mail to yourself. The field won't be empty, but the bcc's won't see
each other, only you.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Andy Gallant a...@agallant.com wrote:
In Outlook 2003 on Vista HP, I'm testing BCCs to multiple
Not sure this is off-topic but is this a sign of the times:
http://tinyurl.com/ygeo84p
From The Times
November 25, 2009
Wikipedia shows signs of stalling as number of volunteers falls sharply
It was one of the internet’s most ambitious, radical and ultimately
successful ideas.
Eight years ago
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:43 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
I know plenty of smokers who didn't get lung cancer, doesn't mean smoking
doesn't cause it.
Yep, My point was that smoker's smoke may have caused lung cancer in people
who never smoked.
Apparently the tar build up in a smokers
I had a machine that was located in a smokers home. (husband and
wife) and it was always a gooey mess when I went to work on
it. Required a lot of cleaning to get stuff done.
I can see charging an upcharge but not to even work on it, is a
little bit far fetched.
Stewart
At 10:18 AM
The recent news of the changing of climate data to fit what researches want
instead of fact is in some ways similar
That is what Fox and the rest of the denier community wants you to think, but
it is not at all what the emails said. Unfortunately, this isn't the right
place to discuss it.
John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:43 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
I know plenty of smokers who didn't get lung cancer, doesn't mean smoking
doesn't cause it.
Yep, My point was that smoker's smoke may have caused lung cancer in people
who never smoked.
Or more
My aunt, who smoked, favored a corn-cob pipe. The tobacco (which she
grew) never hurt her, and the pipe greatly enhanced her image with the
students that she taught.
Jordan wrote:
John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:43 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
I know plenty of
I've got two drives I should have been using a mirroring tool to...mirror.
But due to laziness and thinking it would be easy to not, I had not. So now
I am checking for missing files between the two.
Drive 1 has folder A with 13 files in the folder. If I get properties on
this folder, it says
12 matches
Mail list logo
