You brought it up. Don't if you don't want it discussed.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:13 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:43 AM, mike wrote:
The last few contests when linux, os x and windows were all on a level
playing field, linux was the only one that took any 'work' to
Agree about the topic hijacking. Start a new thread people; it's as
easy as changing the subject line.
The problem with this ACID test is that it wasn't designed by the
people that authored the #1 internet browser. If those people wrote
the test, their browser would pass it with flying colors,
I was mistaken when I called you catatonic, Mike. You are a moron. The
Acid Test has absolutely nothing to do with security. You have lost all
association with logic.
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
Why do you do this? READ the thread. Tom brought up security. You
guys
No, that misses the point. That only allows the guilty to bury the
evidence.
The Acid test is only worth paying attention to because it is written a
standards organization http://acid3.acidtests.org/, not by the
authors of the software to be tested. The tests then measure standards
defined by
You are brilliant. Instead of double checking what I said, you call me
names. In full is Tom's previous post in which you will notice if you are
able to read, about MS and security. I have put it in bold and italics and
added color to the important words, have someone read it to you noticing
Did you just say tom is droppin' acid (again)?
-Original Message-
From: mike [mailto:xha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: IE8/9 Fail Acid Test Badly
Why do you do this? READ the thread. Tom brought up security. You guys
are like broken records,
-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com]
On Behalf Of Snyder, Mark
- IdM (IS)
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 12:14 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] IE8/9 Fail Acid Test Badly
I was mistaken when
On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
This is totally uncalled for. It was Tom who brought up security.
Mike simply responded.
Sigh, here we go again.
I extracted an interesting quote from a link posted by Mike. Mike's
link had nothing to do with ACID. I guess I should have
I should have never held that gun your head when you posted that
excerpt..hey waitasecond...I never held a gun to your head! Maybe you
should have posted an excerpt about IE loss of market share which could be
tied to it's non standards compliance? I dunno, just a thought. The
security thing
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120203569.html
But even today, they still don't play that nicely. As you can see in
this video about IE9 http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/IE-9-Standards-and-Interoperability/
, they are still nowhere near passing the
http://vista.blorge.com/2009/12/02/firefox-overtakes-internet-explorer-in-germany/
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:45 PM, tjp t...@tjpa.com wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120203569.html
But even today, they still don't play that nicely. As you can see
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:02 PM, mike wrote:
http://vista.blorge.com/2009/12/02/firefox-overtakes-internet-explorer-in-germany/
It will be interesting to see what if any effect this has on hacker
activity in the country. Defenders of Microsoft’s security record have
previously argued that
12 matches
Mail list logo
