network latency? for an example, see
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826807/en-us
Vicky Staubly wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Tony B wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question. Not the way you put it,
anyway. In the scenario you describe, there should be no CPU
'slowdown' at all, since the
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Tony B wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question. Not the way you put it,
anyway. In the scenario you describe, there should be no CPU
'slowdown' at all, since the CPU isn't being used completely.
Some things, like having to swap due to memory shortage, don't
show up as
I'm not sure I understand the question. Not the way you put it,
anyway. In the scenario you describe, there should be no CPU
'slowdown' at all, since the CPU isn't being used completely.
Maybe you're having some trouble with a specific program?
On Jan 30, 2008 8:04 PM, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here is a curiosity question about CPU usage in Windows XP -- not
important, just wondering. This question shows my ignorance of the
computer.
I notice that the computer execution speed seems independent of the CPU
usage. For example, suppose that two processes are running
simultaneously, w
