On Dec 5, 2009, at 6:37 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Apparently the Apple product images got rejected as inappropriate
content.
I wonder what is inappropriate about the imagery of old macs- erotic
or
obscenity is out? Apple should be providing this imagery themselves
in the
first place
That was the problem...they reject the use of images they gave the
developers.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:37 PM, John Duncan Yoyo
johnduncany...@gmail.comwrote:
Apparently the Apple product images got rejected as inappropriate content.
I wonder what is inappropriate about the imagery of old
On Dec 3, 2009, at 11:27 PM, mike wrote:
Apple's App Store police have again exhibited a brush with common
sense,
and allowed another iPhone app to display previously forbidden
images of
Cupertino hardware.
Just to make Mike feel all warm an fuzzy, the Sex App Shop offers porn
for the
Ok now that explains a lot...you feel that looking at apple products is like
looking at porn. Maybe you can go on Dr. Drew's sex rehab show...as long as
he doesn't use macs.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:42 AM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Dec 3, 2009, at 11:27 PM, mike wrote:
Apple's App
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/03/mactracker_gets_apple_images/
Apple's App Store police have again exhibited a brush with common sense,
and allowed another iPhone app to display previously forbidden images of
Cupertino hardware.
Check out the pics in the link...Apple wasn't going to allow
