This was the kind of issue that I was really wondering about when I
made the initial post on this.
tjpa wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Stephen Brownfield wrote:
According to the Daily Mail, the ICANN board will pass a resolution
this Friday that will allow entire Web addresses to be wri
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Stephen Brownfield wrote:
According to the Daily Mail, the ICANN board will pass a resolution
this Friday that will allow entire Web addresses to be written in
non-Latin alphabets.
There were several false starts on this that created huge security
holes. The bi
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Stephen Brownfield wrote:
I read that ICANN is planning on changing the rules of Web
addresses, by allowing non-Latin alphabet characters. Here's the
link:
Do we let foreigners use the web? How did that happen?
*
At 9:42 AM -0400 10/27/09, Stephen Brownfield wrote:
I read that ICANN is planning on changing the rules of Web
addresses, by allowing non-Latin alphabet characters. Here's the
link:
http://www.switched.com/2009/10/26/web-to-go-truly-world-wide-with-non-latin-urls/
"According to the Daily M
It is both good and bad.
Good in that you will now have more people making more web pages
using foreign and native characters to create such web pages. (Did I
say good?)
Bad in that you have done away with standardization of any type.
There is a reason that all airplane pilots must know Eng
I read that ICANN is planning on changing the rules of Web addresses, by
allowing non-Latin alphabet characters. Here's the link:
http://www.switched.com/2009/10/26/web-to-go-truly-world-wide-with-non-latin-urls/
"According to the Daily Mail, the ICANN board will pass a resolution
this Fri
