This explains a lot. Some things run in 32 bit, some in 64 bit. It
all depends.
http://www.ahatfullofsky.comuv.com/English/Programs/SMS/SMS.html
There is a lot of confusion about the fact that Snow Leopard starts
by default with a 32-bit kernel even though nearly everything else is
64-bit
Not too far I already have pre-orders in for a few copies.
Stewart
At 09:58 AM 8/25/2009, you wrote:
This explains a lot. Some things run in 32 bit, some in 64 bit. It
all depends.
http://www.ahatfullofsky.comuv.com/English/Programs/SMS/SMS.html
There is a lot of confusion about the fact
Was someone asking?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:58 AM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
This explains a lot. Some things run in 32 bit, some in 64 bit. It all
depends.
http://www.ahatfullofsky.comuv.com/English/Programs/SMS/SMS.html
There is a lot of confusion about the fact that Snow Leopard
I was wondering why some authors have already claimed the new Mac OS
was going to have better compatibility with old 32 bit apps than Win7.
Now I see - basically because the OS is still 32 bit itself.
I'm not at all sure what the comment about Win7 being way in the
future means. Many people -
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Tony B wrote:
Now I see - basically because the OS is still 32 bit itself.
You don't see all that well (why am I not surprised?).
OS X.6 is set to run a 32-bit kernel as the default. It can be set to
run a 64-bit kernel or you can just press the 6 and 4 keys
You are kicking me off the list for asking? Nice.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mike wrote:
Was someone asking?
Then butt out. You are not invited to this conversation.
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mike wrote:
Was someone asking?
Then butt out. You are not invited to this conversation.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Not too far I already have pre-orders in for a few copies.
Yes I saw, M$ wanted to be paid 3 months ahead on the promise of
delivering an operating system and the faithful got their credit
cards out.
On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:45 PM, mike wrote:
You are kicking me off the list for asking? Nice.
Cue the violins.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member
On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:00 PM, rleesimon wrote:
I just had a 4 min conversation with
their customer service and with that ...as I rarely if ever text, I
got that
off halving my internet monthly charge, dropped to 550min/mo reducing
another chunk, was able to retain my more that 5000 minutes of
Gimme the little one. Plaintive and sorrowful.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:45 PM, mike wrote:
You are kicking me off the list for asking? Nice.
Cue the violins.
Then why the F didn't you just say that without expecting us to read
that long article?
So now you're saying the only difference is the new Mac OS will
combine both 64 and 32 bit versions in the same package, and the
installer must choose 64 bit manually. Win7 will come in two different
binaries,
http://www.parallels.com/news/id,19860
Parallels Desktop Switch to Mac Edition Offers Lifeline to Frustrated
PC Users
Switching from PC to Mac is on the rise: analyst reports on
operating system market share show that Mac OS X market growth comes
at the expense of Windows’ market share.
On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Tony B wrote:
So now you're saying the only difference is the new Mac OS will
combine both 64 and 32 bit versions in the same package, and the
installer must choose 64 bit manually. Win7 will come in two different
binaries, and the installer must use the correct one.
If I click on the link, do you get a kickback? I'll click twice to help the
economy if so...
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:02 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
http://www.parallels.com/news/id,19860
Parallels Desktop Switch to Mac Edition Offers Lifeline to Frustrated PC
Users
Switching from
This is interesting stuff. Some if the things I read in the late 90s and
early 2000s seemed to suggest that the Linux and BSD type platforms were
antiquated.
Probably FUD.
But Apple is still moving forward and further refining and updating the
OS X core.
TPiwowar wrote:
This explains a lot.
I can't imagine the need to switch between them will occur often.
Presumably there will be a few people that upgrade their systems in
mid-install, but not many I would imagine. Fewer still will be those
that will do it without _expecting_ to reinstall the OS.
So you're saying if I install OSX 32
Don't bother; it's just an ad for software. Oddly, it's software that
allows someone to run their PC on a Mac, which simply means a lot of
those figures Tom's quoting are probably inaccurate. I mean, if
someone buys a Mac and runs their PC on it, are they a Windows user or
a Mac user?
On Tue,
MS has not because no one would notice that they are running 64bit or
32bit. The only ones choosing 64 are those who know what it is, the ones
who don't know..well they wouldn't use it anyhow and if they did, they
wouldn't even know it.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:16 PM, TPiwowar t...@tjpa.com
Measuring by the thing that matters..money, they are a mac user. Apple
makes money on the hardware, not the software so they really give a rats
tail what os you use as long as you buy their hardware.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't bother; it's just an ad
 Thanks Mark Rev.
Worked like a charm.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
An interesting article in Info World.
http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows/snow-leopard-just-cheap-windows-7-knockoff-798
Quoted from the first para..
Where's the beef? That's the idiom that jumps to mind as I work my
way through Galen Gruman's
From what I understand this really is an under the hood update. It's not
meant to be feature ridden for the end user. I've also read that this
update will introduce technologies that will only be taken advantage of over
time as applications are written specifically for the update. This is also
On Aug 25, 2009, at 4:36 PM, Rich Schinnell wrote:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows/snow-leopard-just-cheap-
windows-7-knockoff-798
Oh pleeese! A half-baked WFB spouting about the wonderfulness of
Vista plus claims that X.6 is somehow a copy of M$'s yet to be
released OS. Tell us about
On Aug 25, 2009, at 3:42 PM, mike wrote:
MS has not because no that they are running 64bit or
32bit.
Got it. Official M$ line is that 64-bit is useless, something that
no one would notice.
You think we are stupid?
I would think that you'll be dead meat after this post :))
Richard P.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Rich Schinnellrichnrockvi...@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting article in Info World.
http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows/snow-leopard-just-cheap-windows-7-knockoff-798
Maybe I will get
On Aug 25, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Tony B wrote:
So you're saying if I install OSX 32 bit today, then change my mobo
and CPU, I can simply switch to 64 bit next year? Just throw a switch
and no OS reinstall will be required? Nice, if true.
The OS loads either the 32 or 64-bit kernel at startup.
I got this the other day while I was on Boingo in an airport.
It stopped after a few minutes.
Dunno
--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Richard P. richs...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Richard P. richs...@gmail.com
Subject: [CGUYS] Google's Sorry
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Date: Tuesday, August
Nope they don't get paid until it is shipped! Did not order through
MS, ordered through merchants who cannot charge until it is shipped.,
Who's on first? is very important to Tom. Humor him and maybe he'll shut
up about it.
Good show old boy! Maybe next time is when we catch the weasel in
Hello all:
Are there gremlins out to get me? I swear that the day I said to myself that
one of the reasons why I continued to favor my MAC over the PC laptops I get
with each job is how much more efficient it is when using the internet..all
of a sudden, it now acts really slowly and fails
Change your DNS servers on the Mac to 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220 and
see if it makes a difference.
--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Arnold Kee a...@expandingthecircle.org wrote:
From: Arnold Kee a...@expandingthecircle.org
Subject: [CGUYS] Sudden Mac OS X V4 Inefficiency
To:
I live in No. Va. also and use T-Mobile pre-paid for uses like you describe.
Advantages:
- low cost: first year I paid $100 for 1000 min. Used 500 in first year,
second year is $50 for another year. Hard to beat $4 per month.
Disadvantages: T-Mobile coverage is spotty. OK here. Non-existent
Actually, that's $8.33/mo the first year. Hard to say how long you could
keep renewing minutes after that as the networks change and to get the
better coverage you may need a new phone.
Still, $4.15/mo for 10 minutes of phone calls is pretty bad. Not so long ago
that used to cost about $0.25
33 matches
Mail list logo