Not quite sure what your point is here, 1 suicide in a population of
300 is a suicide rate of 1/300 and 3 suicides in a population of
900 is still a rate of 1/300, etc. We were talking about suicide
_rates_, not raw numbers, and as I said, densely populated areas
have lower suicide rates than
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Stewart Marshall
revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
They have maintained for some time that they have a unique status within
the USA. (You might have heard the sound bite of their current governor a
few months ago proposing secession?)
Of course this is all
Rick Perry is an embarrassment to the state educational system.
He said when Texas entered the union in 1845, it was with the
understanding it could later pull out. In fact, as the historical
website points out (and Texas Monthly reminds its readers
quite often), the agreement was that Texas
Most states are still republics to a point. Of course this depends on your
view of what a republic is...I know one of the wacks on that TX board when
they were reviewing their history books didn't want to include that the US
was a republic, she felt it was misleading even if true.
On Sun, May 2,
On May 1, 2010, at 7:18 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
You cannot have oil drilling off-shore without without accidents,
spills and likely occasional disastrous consequences.
Ditto for nuclear.
*
** List info,
On May 1, 2010, at 7:18 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
I know he was, and personally I disagreed with that political
decision. I thought such a wide open proposition was a recipe for
looming disaster, and so did many others, including, as you point out,
at least some conservatives.
He threw
On May 1, 2010, at 10:31 PM, Stewart Marshall wrote:
Dont smear the whole state by this action.
Perhaps, if this were the only example of same.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
We'll just power everything off hamsters.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:53 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On May 1, 2010, at 7:18 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
You cannot have oil drilling off-shore without without accidents,
spills and likely occasional disastrous consequences.
Ditto for
BHO was all for drilling until the shit hit the fan.
No, he was never all for drilling. He gave this to the Republicans in another
one of his misguided attempts to be bipartisan or to get them to vote for
something he wanted.
When will he learn?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214593564769072.html
Not a bad article on the matter.
On May 2, 2010 5:59 PM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:35 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote: We'll just
power everything off ha...
I will be a
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:04 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214593564769072.html
Not a bad article on the matter.
Back in 2009 BP testified before a federal regulatory board about
potential environmental damage that this particular
Generally, people who live in NoVa don't consider themselves residents
of Virginia and feel shamed when reminded.
Is that the general or the particular?
Don't consider themselves residents of Virginia?
Well, Richmond doesn't think so.
Don't be ashamed of being a Virginian, Tom, here's a
On May 1, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
Don't be ashamed of being a Virginian, Tom, here's a nice warm bowl
of grits and some frizzled ham for you, along with some Jeffersonian
democracy.
Back in the 18th century it was possible to be proud to be a
Virginian. These days all we can
On May 1, 2010, at 12:39 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Also statistics can be misleading.
Statistics can be misused or misinterpreted, but they are never
misleading. They just are what they are.
*
** List info,
On Apr 30, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Jeff Miles wrote:
I hate being stuck in the middle. I have to agree with you Mike. I'm
a stanch liberal, but also a strong advocate of toting guns. For
those who think guns kill people and not people kill people, by that
logic we should ban cars. We should also
On May 1, 2010, at 1:19 PM, tjpa wrote:
Back in the 18th century it was possible to be proud to be a
Virginian. These days all we can be thankful for is that we are not
Arizona. Though some of us aspire to that too
Another example...
http://www.timesnews.net/article.php?id=9022692
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Back in the 18th century it was possible to be proud to be a Virginian.
These days all we can be thankful for is that we are not Arizona. Though
some of us aspire to that too
Another example...
And the Governor of Virginia seys...
Don't get all bent out of shape, BHO was all for drilling until the
shit hit the fan. There are quite a few conservatives that are,
actually, pretty conservative WRT this. And were from the start.
That's why Sarah Palin wasn't acceptable to us. I speak
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Eric S. Sande esa...@verizon.net wrote:
Don't get all bent out of shape, BHO was all for drilling until the
shit hit the fan.
I know he was, and personally I disagreed with that political
decision. I thought such a wide open proposition was a recipe for
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Eric S. Sande esa...@verizon.net wrote:
Generally, people who live in NoVa don't consider themselves residents of
Virginia and feel shamed when reminded.
Is that the general or the particular?
Don't consider themselves residents of Virginia?
Well, Richmond
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 7:52 PM, John Duncan Yoyo
johnduncany...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't be ashamed of being a Virginian, Tom, here's a nice warm bowl
of grits and some frizzled ham for you, along with some Jeffersonian
democracy.
Texas threw him out of the textbooks for being to liberal.
Lets correct things a little bit here.
A small group/committee decided this for the whole state.
Kind of dumb but that is how it works.
Similar problem in my church body a small group decides what our
publishing house should put out.
Dont smear the whole state by this action.
But also
They are a republic..just like the US.
On May 1, 2010 7:44 PM, Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Lets correct things a little bit here.
A small group/committee decided this for the whole state.
Kind of dumb but that is how it works.
Similar problem in my church body a small
They have maintained for some time that they have a unique status
within the USA. (You might have heard the sound bite of their
current governor a few months ago proposing secession?)
Of course this is all hogwash, but you know Texans bigger than snot
and about as useful.
Stewart
At 09:55
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
Seen 'em, thanks. But you do realize that contrary to your statement
what you suggest IS legal where you live.
Generally, people who live in NoVa don't consider themselves residents
of Virginia and feel shamed when reminded. I don't even own
What does a criminal stealing an iPhone and another criminal buying the
iPhone have anything to do with bleeding heart liberals? BTW, it has been
decided yet if any criminal activity took place, but I guess we can exempt you
from the jury.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
I'm a strong Apple supporter. However, what they did by releasing these
prototypes was just plain stupid.
As to your comment below, this is crap. Bringing up the bible, Moses,
the 10 commandments, Hitler, Nazis, is a cheap trick that if used means you've
probably already lost
Apples and oranges. Please excuse the pun.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Apr 28, 2010, at 7:17 PM, David K Watson wrote:
You can personally feel that Apple was foolish in how they let the
phone
You are assuming a lot. So far no one has been tried and convicted.
Therefore, legally, no illegalities have occurred. When it's been deemed, tried
and a jury says so, then you can rightfully claim illegalities occurred. I'll
say the same to you that I said to Tipa, I guess you're
No, it's not.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:36 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
That is not a fair or accurate comparison.
It
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
No, it's not.
This is one of those occasions where Top posting doesn't make sense It
just makes it look like you are reenacting Monty Python's Argument Clinic
Sketch.
--
John Duncan Yoyo
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
I'm a strong Apple supporter. However, what they did by releasing
these prototypes was just plain stupid.
As to your comment below, this is crap. Bringing up the bible,
Moses, the 10 commandments, Hitler,
I'm not a lawyer or a jurist or even an avid fan of Matlock. Just a little
armchair judgement. I do know what has ensued was unethical, and I don't
think it was limited to Gizmodo.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
You are assuming a lot. So far no
It is a very conservative town. I live in the part of the state where
many want to break the state in two. We'd have the liberal West Washington
state and the conservative East Washington state. I think that would be
horrible, giving us an odd number of states, unless we can all go
I hate being stuck in the middle. I have to agree with you Mike. I'm a
stanch liberal, but also a strong advocate of toting guns. For those who think
guns kill people and not people kill people, by that logic we should ban cars.
We should also ban all smoking, all alcohol and anything
Don't forget bathtubs!
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
I hate being stuck in the middle. I have to agree with you Mike. I'm
a stanch liberal, but also a strong advocate of toting guns. For those who
think guns kill people and not people kill
It's not a fair comparison because a car left running (while stupid,
and illegal in my town) has a high expectation of being reclaimed or returned
to by the owner. A phone left and not claimed within a reasonable amount of
time is considered abandoned. And I'd consider a reasonable
Product testing? I'm thinking of the stealth fighter jet of the 80s'.
I'm sure it was product tested and didn't need to be parked in the parking lot
of a bar. Come on, common sense. The guy who lost the phone also lost his
common sense. And so did Apple, in this instance.
Jeff Miles
The fact that you didn't SEE the stealth fighter jet at the bar just means
it was pretty stealthy.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
Product testing? I'm thinking of the stealth fighter jet of the
80s'. I'm sure it was product tested and didn't
This is purely anecdotal, but aren't holidays the highest rate for
suicide, regardless of population size. Of course trying to reinstall Windows
probably should be lumped in there some place.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
Wow, you have some amazing insider information on what Apple is
thinking and planning. So when are they going to leave a holographic G6 laying
around?
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Apr 29, 2010,
Those people aren't suicidal, they do have a higher tendancy to toss their
computers through windows.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
This is purely anecdotal, but aren't holidays the highest rate for
suicide, regardless of population size. Of
Am not.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Apr 30, 2010, at 2:15 AM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
No, it's not.
This is
I'm a stanch liberal, but also a strong advocate of toting guns. For those who
think guns kill people and not people kill people, by that logic we should ban
cars. We should also ban all smoking, all
alcohol and anything proven to be a carcinogen.
This is not going to go anywhere, but just for
I agree.
It's not going to go anywhere.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Chris Dunford seed...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a stanch liberal, but also a strong advocate of toting guns. For those
who think guns kill people and not people kill people, by that logic we
should ban cars. We should
Like I said, you're excused. Nothing personal. But pre-knowladge and
judgment pretty much dismisses you from the jury pool.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Apr 30, 2010, at 8:58 AM, mike wrote:
I'm
And Windows. Shards of broken glass when the monitor is slammed against
the wall can be a real b%#ch.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:06 AM, mike wrote:
Don't forget bathtubs!
Actually I was half right.
Note the fine print of the map:
Based on death data from 2000 through 2006, this US map of the
smoothed, county-level, age-adjusted suicide rates indicate that
suicide rates are highest in the western and northwestern regions of
the United States. There is also a
Yeah...the headline should clue you in. Fact vs speculation...speculation
usually, at least to the rest of us means 'this part may be BS but we'll say
it anyway'.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:35 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:36 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
It
And how is this different then today? When I call in a crime I just get
a case number for the insurance company.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:37 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
On Apr
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:56 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
If I was a judge in this case my first query would be if this item is worth
so much, money, market share..etc...why did you send some kid into a bar to
leave it while he went out and took a leak in the alley? This super secret
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:35 AM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Apple sent folks over to the guy's house to demand he give them back the
phone. He didn't.
Let's do get the facts straight. The PCWorld article you referenced
was drawing upon another story that appeared in Wired Magazine.
I don't think you have the facts quite straight here. Here is
Gizmodo's own account of how they got the phone:
http://gizmodo.com/5520438/how-apple-lost-the-next-iphone
According to this account, the phone was picked up at the bar
by the person who was sitting next to Powell (the one who
This is the problem...let's get the facts straight and then referenced is a
part of the article that is not confirmed...
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:56 AM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:35 AM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Apple sent folks over to
On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:56 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Additionally, it was at first denied by the San Mateo Police that
Apple ever had any hand in the raid and search of the premises in
question. We now know that to have been untrue, and a silly thing for
the authorities to have said in the
On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Jeff Miles wrote:
And how is this different then today? When I call in a crime I just
get a case number for the insurance company.
You must have a bunch of tea baggers running your city council.
On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:23 AM, David K Watson wrote:
Whether the police were within the law in executing their warrant
is a matter of dispute, but even if being a blogger makes Jason
Chen a journalist, there is already some legal precedent that
shield laws can't be used to enable journalists to
That's why the murder rate in DC is one of the highest in the country.
Places where people walk around with guns is safer than those places who
don't.
I see you've devolved into 'no facts for you' mode and will now not answer
for any of your previous misstatements. Just keep tossing it on the
That is not a fair or accurate comparison.
How is it not a fair comparison? A running car in a convenience
store parking lot has the presumption that the owner will return
to it very quickly, while a phone that has been left unclaimed for a few
hours does not, but that has no bearing on
http://mashable.com/2010/04/29/jon-stewart-apple/
The definitive take on the issue.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:57 AM, David K Watson
davidkirkwat...@gmail.comwrote:
That is not a fair or accurate comparison.
How is it not a fair comparison? A running car in a convenience
store parking
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:46 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
In my town the names of crime victims and witnesses are not given out by the
police.
What? No one suspected that Apple Corp. was the claimant here?
All that the police said initially was that Apple Corp. did not have
a hand in
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:49 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:23 AM, David K Watson wrote:
Whether the police were within the law in executing their warrant
is a matter of dispute, but even if being a blogger makes Jason
Chen a journalist, there is already some legal
Additionally, there is a difference between the police denying
that Apple had any part in the raid and their simply being silent
on the matter until they made an official statement, which appears
to be what actually happened.
As to Apple's involvement, it looks like Apple didn't file the
OK, so supposedly Apple sent folks over to the guy's house to
demand he give them back the phone, but he wasn't there, so
he didn't. Then presumably having heard about this from his
roommate who was there, he nonetheless sells the iPhone to
Gizmodo.
It still looks wrong to me. PC World
I doubt Steve would agree with you.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:57 AM, David K Watson
davidkirkwat...@gmail.comwrote:
but Powell is arguably the more aggrieved party.
*
** List info, subscription management, list
Bottom line is, we know Giz and the guy who sold the phone knew Powell had
lost it and could have contacted him. They chose not to. Like I said
before, Calacanis's take on this is everyone involved is either an idiot or
a dick, there are no innocents here...I like that version myself.
On Thu,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:57 PM, David K Watson
davidkirkwat...@gmail.com wrote:
As to Apple's involvement, it looks like Apple didn't file the theft
report. Powell did, with the support of his employer's legal staff.
True, Apple clearly wanted the matter to be pursued, but Powell
is
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:06 PM, David K Watson
davidkirkwat...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, so supposedly Apple sent folks over to the guy's house to
demand he give them back the phone, but he wasn't there, so
he didn't. Then presumably having heard about this from his
roommate who was there, he
I doubt Steve would agree with you.
but Powell is arguably the more aggrieved party.
The entire iPhone prototype adventure--Lost--can't be too serious to
Apple. Otherwise they would have fired the guy who lost it. Just like
the TV show, there's lots of confusing twists, and both
The thing is, Apple has never liked this kind of noise. They like noise
they control. And at this point, if this guy gets fired it would make the
evening news.
J months are usually the months you look for this stuff.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:
I
And I am already tuning out of this.
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
The entire iPhone prototype adventure--Lost--can't be too serious to
Apple. Otherwise they would have fired the guy who lost it. Just like
the TV show, there's lots of confusing twists, and both versions
The thing is, Apple has never liked this kind of noise. They like noise
they control. And at this point, if this guy gets fired it would make the
evening news.
Any noise is free publicity. Controlled noise is better.
Have you ever done marketing or advertising? There are many ways to keep
Frequently? Name the last Apple product that was accidentally released.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:20 PM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:
The thing is, Apple has never liked this kind of noise. They like noise
they control. And at this point, if this guy gets fired it would make the
On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:33 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
None of this whole affair is devoid of wrongness, in my humble
opinion. I think it was wrongheaded for an Apple Corp. insider to
take a highly secretive prototype iPhone into an establishment well
known for being a watering hole that
Yes that's exactly what Steve said, zero product testing, none, zip...the
phone should stay in the clean room up until delivered.
To the rest of us Steve said you probably don't need to test your product in
the lions den and maybe taking it to a grocery store, out on the
street...maybe a five and
On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:56 PM, mike wrote:
That's why the murder rate in DC is one of the highest in the country.
Places where people walk around with guns is safer than those places
who
don't.
Towns with pop 10 usually do have lower murder rates, prolly have
higher suicide rates though.
Do your research before you flap your gums.
WRONG!
Stewart
At 05:11 PM 4/29/2010, you wrote:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:56 PM, mike wrote:
That's why the murder rate in DC is one of the highest in the country.
Places where people walk around with guns is safer than those places
who
don't.
I believe that statistics show that the suicide rate increases the
higher density the population.
Also during highly stressed conditions.
Stewart
At 05:22 PM 4/29/2010, you wrote:
Do your research before you flap your gums.
WRONG!
Stewart
At 05:11 PM 4/29/2010, you wrote:
On Apr 29,
On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
I believe that statistics show that the suicide rate increases the
higher density the population.
That's reported suicides. When nobody notices it doesn't get reported.
The sun just bleaches your bones.
On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
Why did I think you lived in VA?
I do. Wanna see my collection of assault weapons and cruise missiles?
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,
Tom having lived in the said communities most of my ministry I know
the statistics.
Just not true.
Oh and they have a lot more firearms than you can count. Most of it
long barrel not short barrel.
Stewart
At 08:01 PM 4/29/2010, you wrote:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Rev. Stewart
I do. Wanna see my collection of assault weapons and cruise missiles?
Seen 'em, thanks. But you do realize that contrary to your statement
what you suggest IS legal where you live.
http://vaguninfo.com/pages/opencarry.htm
The fact that most people don't do it has nothing to do with whether
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:37 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
You keep insisting that Apple should not do product testing. Where did you
get such an idea? Microsoft?
Let's not be silly or intentionally inaccurate when describing what
another poster wrote. I never said that Apple Corp. should
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:23 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Haven't heard anything about attempts to return the phone before Giz bought
it..?
http://gizmodo.com/5520729/why-apple-couldnt-get-the-lost-iphone-back?skyline=trues=i
This whole thing is just stupid. I hope Apple isn't behind any of the
prosecution of this person, their employee, for loosing the phone. I also hope
they're not behind the prosecution of the person who sold it, or the person who
blogged what it's advancements where over their most
This Giz article just makes me want to find someone who works at Gizmodo and
slap em around. This blog post front to back is an insult to their
readers. They make not one statement as fact, it's all maybe and perhaps.
They also gloss over the fact they knew who the phone belonged to...I don't
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:11 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
This Giz article just makes me want to find someone who works at Gizmodo and
slap em around. This blog post front to back is an insult to their
readers. They make not one statement as fact, it's all maybe and perhaps.
They also
Most I've heard have dismissed this believing exposing the new iphone this
early would kill current sales.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:51 AM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
I also think that Apple was also silly to let something
super-secretive be taken out in public. Unless,
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:51 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think that Apple was also silly to let something
super-secretive be taken out in public. Unless, of course, what
essentially transpired is what they wanted to have happen.
Releasing new products without field testing is not a
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:10 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Most I've heard have dismissed this believing exposing the new iphone this
early would kill current sales.
Are you saying that folks do not already suppose that Apple is going
to release a new version of their ubiquitous phone in
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:54 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Releasing new products without field testing is not a good idea. You are
taking quite an extreme stance if your efforts to oppose Apple. Perhaps you
should run for the Senate?
Field testing an as yet publicly unseen and unreleased
I'm saying most industry folks are saying that putting a new iphone into the
faces of those who may be buying one, may make them wait till this new one
comes out. Especially one that may look very different than the current
one.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:28 PM, phartz...@gmail.com
If I was a judge in this case my first query would be if this item is worth
so much, money, market share..etc...why did you send some kid into a bar to
leave it while he went out and took a leak in the alley? This super secret
phone from Apple wasn't taken from Apple headquarters by a team of IMF
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying most industry folks are saying that putting a new iphone into the
faces of those who may be buying one, may make them wait till this new one
comes out. Especially one that may look very different than the current
one.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:
This whole thing is just stupid. I hope Apple isn't behind any of the
prosecution of this person, their employee, for loosing the phone. I also
hope they're not behind the prosecution of the person who sold it, or
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:56 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
If I was a judge in this case my first query would be if this item is worth
so much, money, market share..etc...why did you send some kid into a bar to
leave it while he went out and took a leak in the alley? This super secret
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:25 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
However, it is my position that they brought this upon
themselves either through intent or through foolishness. In either
case, they should shoulder the blame themselves in this instance
instead of lashing out at others by causing the
Sounds like you read half of Jason Calacanis's breakdown where he said
everyone involved including Apple were d#$ks.
On Apr 28, 2010 4:43 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:25 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: However, it is
my position that they bro...
You bleeding-heart
On Apr 28, 2010, at 8:49 PM, mike wrote:
Sounds like you read half of Jason Calacanis's breakdown where he said
everyone involved including Apple were d#$ks.
I bet that if we were to come over to your house and help ourselves to
your belongings you would be singing a tune similar to Apple.
Lousy analogy Tom. You act as if you have not read any of what has
been written about this item.
The fact is the item was left by absent minded techie at bar.
Item was turned into bar tender who has no idea whose it is.(I
wonder how many folks had been there that night and had phones?)
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
