My initials tjp trigger tjpa and I'm #2 on the page.
Regrettably, my initials are the same as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, the human
equivalent of mad cow disease.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:26 PM, tjp t...@tjpa.com wrote:
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/25/a-is-for-amazon-b-is-for-best-buy/?partner=yahoofinance
Go to Google’s home page or browser toolbar and type a single letter into
the search box. The search engine will then drop down a list of
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:30 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that Google, as well as other search engines, will accept
money from entities so that their names will appear at or near the the
top of any such listings.
G's is based on the popularity of the search term. Maybe you are
thinking
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:54 AM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:30 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that Google, as well as other search engines, will accept
money from entities so that their names will appear at or near the the
top of any such listings.
G's is
On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:42 AM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Well G does do both. Try searching Lawn Mower and you will get
three Sears
listings in orange. The top links are often paid links as well as
all the
ones on the right. Google at least indicates paid links on the top
of the
list with
As do MS and Yahoo.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:42 AM, John Duncan Yoyo
johnduncany...@gmail.comwrote:
Well G does do both. Try searching Lawn Mower and you will get three
Sears
listings in orange. The top links are often paid links as well as all the
ones on the right. Google at least
===
FREE! Register via e-mail to bc...@cpcug.org
===
Capital PC User Group (CPCUG)
Entrepreneurs and Consultants Special Interest Group (EC SIG)
(Meets the
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:37 AM, mike wrote:
*Neither is better on an absolute basis. The choice depends on your
application. Once you know your application the debate goes away.
The debate
only exists when people presume erroneously that someone else's
needs mirror
their own.*
That was
Blu-ray Maker Re-Boxes $500 Player, Charges $3,500
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/blu-ray-maker-re-boxes-500-player-charges-3500/
Lexicon simply bought a batch of Oppos and put them in new cases.
Lest you think we are being picky here, or that Lexicon somehow took
the guts of the
Yep. At least four threads going right now about this on
Audio Asylum, various forums. Lexicon is a division of Harman
International, by the way.
Caught red-handed.
*
** List info, subscription management, list
~ Some Lessons from the ATT/Facebook Switcheroo
EFFector Vol. 23, No. 3, January 26, 2010 edi...@eff.org
A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation ISSN 1062-9424
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
Over the weekend, there was an odd story about people using
Take a look at some of this:
http://www.lampizator.eu/LAMPIZATOR/REFERENCES/wadia%20WT%203200/WT3200.html
http://www.lampizator.eu/LAMPIZATOR/REFERENCES/CYRUS/Cyrus%20DAD1.html
http://www.lampizator.eu/LAMPIZATOR/REFERENCES/Meridian207/meridian207.html
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Ranbo ran...@gmail.com wrote:
*I suppose the emails could even be a scam to get you to call the number to
remain unlisted, thereby unwittingly giving the number to some unscrupulous
party. Just hope the people who were sending these emails around,
including
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
We know better now. Today Kodak is not making Kodachrome any more.
Right. So Kodak dropped a venerable film from their product line.
A large part of the reason was because of competition from Fuji. An
awful lot of photographers
Fuji, Kodak and I believe Ilford are all still producing film.
One of the other reasons Kodachrome was dropped was it required
special processing. Could not be done in, in store labs etc.
Stewart
At 08:54 PM 1/26/2010, you wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:16 PM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:
Over the weekend, there was an odd story about people using ATT's wireless
network trying to log in to Facebook and suddenly finding themselves logged
in to somebody else's Facebook account. What could have caused such a
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall
revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
One of the other reasons Kodachrome was dropped was it required special
processing. Could not be done in, in store labs etc.
Quite so. A nice film, but over time, other formulations achieved
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/terms-ab-use-dancing-different-itunes-differences-
--
WARNING: Due to a Presidential Executive Order, the National Security
Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant or notice.
On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Fuji, Kodak and I believe Ilford are all still producing film.
... and delivering it to customers via horse-drawn carriage.
Here is a thoughtful post...
In a recent conversation with one of the scientists/archivists at the
Getty
What a great read, fell off my chair reading this crazed guy! The shell game
he exposes (loved especially the denuding of the THETA) just confirms my own
position that I would rather hear live performance anytime. Many thanks for
posting this, Eric.
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Eric S. Sande
I have a chance to get pcAnywhere 12.5, for our non-profit. Any
thoughts on it Pro/Con. We primarily run Macs (laptop 10.5 and desktop
10.4) and have one linux box (laptop).
Thanks
Steve
*
** List info, subscription
Except Your Government insists on putting all their archival material on
microfilm, even alongside the digital archives, and archival preservation of
their paper.
Your Government also is the world's largest user of vacuum tubes.
- Original Message -
From: t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com
This is one of the most off-track threads that I can recall. But since
Kodachrome has been mentioned, I thought to recall Kodachrome II, the greatest
color film ever. Disappeared during the rapacious Hunt brothers' execrable
attempt to corner the silver market in the early 70's. Probably the
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:57 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Fuji, Kodak and I believe Ilford are all still producing film.
... and delivering it to customers via horse-drawn carriage.
That is a totally silly and childish and
I would have said so Keith Olbermannish but other than that, this is wholly
Tom P'ish.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:47 PM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:57 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
I downloaded Safari to once again try it out. One thing is driving me
absolutely batty...I click on some links and they open in new windows
instead of just opening in the current window or at the least a new tab. I
have checked the prefs and I can't find anything that seems to kill this
from
On Jan 26, 2010, at 11:13 PM, Ellen Rains Harris wrote:
Your Government also is the world's largest user of vacuum tubes.
Smart move. Vacuum tube circuits are resistant to EMP.
*
** List info, subscription management,
27 matches
Mail list logo
