Re: [CGUYS] Is M$ Going to Blow it Again?

2009-06-01 Thread mike
If anyone can pull defeat from the jaws of victory MS can..

I do wonder about 'computer journalists' when they get the easy wrong
however, buying security software a must?  Those full blown free security
software packages not good enough for him?

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:03 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 Computer World takes note that despite Win7 having fixed many of Vista's
 faults, there are still many ways for M$ to blow the deal. They seem to be
 getting ready to do so -- oh joy!


 http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=339666


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Is M$ Going to Blow it Again?

2009-06-01 Thread Chris Dunford
 If anyone can pull defeat from the jaws of victory 
 MS can..
 
 I do wonder about 'computer journalists' when they 
 get the easy wrong however, buying security software 
 a must?  Those full blown free security software 
 packages not good enough for him?

That jumped out at me as soon as I read it, too.

He also doesn't mention that most netbooks are quite capable of running any
edition of Win7. Starter Edition will, I suppose, be the default OS for base
versions of the machines, but that don't mean you're stuck with it.

I'm also not so sure about the big Linux comeback in netbooks that he seems
to be predicting. Here's what I've noticed (not specifically in this
article). Writers ponder why Linux has been, in general, more successful in
netbooks than in bigger machines. The answer is usually that netbooks are
being used for bare bones computing: email, web, simple documents. You can
do all that in Linux using familiar stuff like OpenOffice and Firefox. But
then they turn right around and say that Win7 Starter sucks because it
doesn't have Aero Glass, fast user switching, and so on. What does any of
that have to do with bare bones computing? Linux is great for netbooks
because bare bones is OK, but Win7 Starter isn't because it's missing Aero
Glass? A little consistency would be nice.

In any event, it will be interesting launch to watch.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Is M$ Going to Blow it Again?

2009-06-01 Thread Brian Jones
Each new M$ OpSys has included a price increase...  slightly higher than 
inflation.

Why should this one be any different?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Is M$ Going to Blow it Again?

2009-06-01 Thread mike
Are you sure?  With Vista MS implemented 47 different versions of it's os so
it would be easy to see it as higher then XP  and especially 95 and 98
considering there was only one version.  Comparing XP pro to Vista
business...what was the increase?

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brian Jones wjone...@carolina.rr.comwrote:

 Each new M$ OpSys has included a price increase...  slightly higher than
 inflation.
 Why should this one be any different?



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Is M$ Going to Blow it Again?

2009-06-01 Thread b_s-wilk

Computer World takes note that despite Win7 having fixed many of Vista's 
faults, there are still many ways for M$ to blow the deal. They seem to be 
getting ready to do so -- oh joy!

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=339666 


Microsoft redefines netbooks yet again, so that they can write their 
software only for a predefined system--their CYA for when it doesn't run 
on YOUR new netbook. Linked from above story:


http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9133460


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Is M$ Going to Blow it Again?

2009-06-01 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 1, 2009, at 9:08 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:
Microsoft redefines netbooks yet again, so that they can write  
their software only for a predefined system--their CYA for when it  
doesn't run on YOUR new netbook. Linked from above story:


I was thinking that M$ was seeking to define the specs narrowly so  
that they could charge a higher price for the OS when it was sold  
with hardware that exceeded the minimum.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*